Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: HEIC files, why not ?
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:22:44 +1300
Organization: Dis
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vmcsvl$3u906$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:22:45 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ef04bfd46f1f5bbdc7a97d735f65ee95";
	logging-data="4137990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18WqHAabL671q/6Uj8QAj5mkS6h4qwS9KA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2WDchqPDT+lgKP/7cAaLBQy87c8=
Content-Language: en-US, en-NZ
Bytes: 1146

Given the claimed benefits of HEIC over JPEG, is there any reason not to 
use them in preference to JPEG/JPG for other than raw images ?

OK, wider (universal) acceptance of JPG. But anything else ?

-- 
geoff