Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFdpbGwgTGF0ZSBOaWdodCBSb2FzdCBOZXdzb20gQW5kIEJhc3MgRm9yIEZpcmVzPyBEb27igJl0SG9sZCBZb3VyIEJyZWF0aC4=?=
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:08:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vmda6h$41l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vm30nj$1p9bq$5@dont-email.me> <vm3rs2$20t9u$1@dont-email.me> <vm6c9m$2hm1t$1@dont-email.me> <vm6f7r$2i033$4@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:08:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d549ca420fcff70ca7a541359fbb5404";
	logging-data="4149"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/t4eP83+RNu41E33Bebeyh4XDUps8c/gA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VOl0fgcwCPsbwOJOL8ZNQ88Ac+0=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2303

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>On Jan 14, 2025 at 11:01:09 AM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On 1/13/2025 3:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>On Jan 13, 2025 at 9:24:37 AM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>>>Afaik, 'climate change' doesn't start fires, it continues them.

>>>California has been known for massive wildfires...

>>Fyi, last night Jon Stewart read your presentation.  Essentially.

>Did he mention the new factoid I heard on CNN-- that this L.A. wildfire has
>released more carbon into the atmosphere than all of the cars and trucks in
>America released in all of 2024?

>So if the Newsoms and the Bass's and the AOCs of the world are really as
>concerned about 'climate change' as they claim to be (and aren't just using it
>as an excuse to control people and remake the society to their socialist
>liking), then they should be all-in on anything that would prevent these
>fires-- desalination plants, timber harvesting, chaparral clearance,
>constructing and filling reservoirs with water instead of flushing it into the
>sea, etc.

>What do you want to be that won't be the case?

I think you missed the point. Atmospheric carbon is bad only if it's
from burning a fossil fuel, not from burning new-growth scrub or
forest.