| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vmdd9v$35kl$3@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 1 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:01:20 +0100 Message-ID: <vmdd9v$35kl$3@solani.org> References: <vjl5u1$sks9$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:01:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="104085"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Uitoa7uyn1oJJDVL1TA/jjvLmWg= In-Reply-To: <vjl5u1$sks9$1@solani.org> X-User-ID: eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVAEmK4wDK/iPYex8Wlf05QcdgZME7tChl1w58Njhu+3/LMsQyeUshbR2tTERIjHDnYdQDK+oUlw== Bytes: 2324 Lines: 41 Programming languages such as Vault, Rust, etc.. have recently popularized substructural logics. Their type systems share various forms of resource awareness. Propositional substructural logics were already discussed when Jan Łukasiewicz and Carew Arthur Meredith met in 1947 in Dublin. We will investigate such logics with the help of Prolog. Links to Dogelog Notebooks that capture the proof finder and the model finder are given at the end of the post. We have practically automatized the work of a Logician in the middle of the previous century. We could determine proper inclusions relationships among the examined Minimal, Affine, Relevant and Linear logics. See also: Substructural Logics via Dogelog Player https://x.com/dogelogch/status/1880084983316115798 Substructural Logics via Dogelog Player https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog Mild Shock schrieb: > Now that Christmas is over, are you excited for the new year? > > Here is the task for Weekend 4: > > - Do the same as for Weekend 2 and Weekend 3 > for a relevant logic. > > This would complete the picture, since we would have: > > Logic Weakening Contraction > Minimal Yes Yes > Relevant No Yes > Affine Yes No > Linear No No