Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmed40$6qm7$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:04:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vmed40$6qm7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vm69a2$2h52d$1@dont-email.me> <vmam6l$3et7s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vmar9r$3g1ud$2@dont-email.me>
 <1r695ej.t31qiz7lhsjkN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <vmb2ko$3hal6$1@dont-email.me>
 <1r69dpn.1bbzdc81ozzc9wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <vmbh9o$14pn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <vmc36h$3mt5f$1@dont-email.me>
 <vmcluq$2drc$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <vmctge$3u72f$1@dont-email.me>
 <vmdhsl$30jh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:04:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="68adfa8e3e76f0eebe2e8c9bdf898e65";
	logging-data="223943"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iawc15PXxpPwpMNQohMrJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XtvVF+Aogx2viOXqLrrx7tVuDEQ=
In-Reply-To: <vmdhsl$30jh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2970

On 1/17/2025 5:19 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
> "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vmctge$3u72f$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 1/16/2025 9:22 PM, Edward Rawde wrote:
>>> "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vmc36h$3mt5f$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/16/2025 10:57 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
>>>>> Databases can also be backed up as human readable text files.
>>>>
>>>> To be fair, a spreadsheet's contents can similarly be exported (CSV).
>>>> I'm not sure how the formulae, formats, etc. are handled, though.
>>>> And, any non-text entries (that might be supported).
>>>
>>> In other words exporting a database as SQL is not in any way similar to exporting a spreadsheet as csv.
>>
>> Of course it is.  The difference lies in WHAT you are exporting.
>> What does a 3MB photo (stored as a BLOB) look like when exported in SQL?
>> Is it any more recognizable in that form?
> 
> You may as well ask what it looks like when a jpg is opened in a text editor.

You touted the fact that YOU can see your data as human readable files
(in the event <something> happens to the database software).  That
this is an asset that DBMSs have over spreadsheets.

My point is that this only partially works as you expect.
A spreadsheet's contents can be exported as <whatever>-delimited
form which will make the same sorts of data that are readable when
exported in an SQL dump "readable", readable.