Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From: Jean-Paul <contact@usenet.ovh>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 05:10:15 EST
Organization: NUO - News.Usenet.Ovh
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
Message-ID: <vmek79$cohq$1@news.usenet.ovh>
References: <vla2t6$5g57$1@dont-email.me> <677999c5@news.ausics.net> <677a2282$1@news.ausics.net> <20250105082258.0c55387a@ryz.dorfdsl.de> <677a83c6$1@news.ausics.net> <20250105212436.52a5a78b@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6";
	logging-data="11637"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha256:SDHby2asFvDZ7DNpB74GwKCwTfT2bs1U7LMm1a/l5QM=
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to              ngp@nan.users.panix.com
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical/policy queries to ngp-admin@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: DE FR
Authentication-Results: mail1.panix.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=usenet.ovh
Authentication-Results: mail1.panix.com; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=news.usenet.ovh
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-fr
X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP news.groups.proposals
 iEYEARECAAYFAmeLfgcACgkQrPkQbuk9hduIYQCgrj7gaERq6R3qkZiiFiAnZVlm
 kFMAnjDDqn91EbfRcdFCgCCrWY5f7Iq+
 =nj4N
Bytes: 2453
Lines: 15

Marco Moock a exprim� avec pr�cision :
> On 05.01.2025 09:04 Uhr noel wrote:
>
>> If nobody is moderating the groups, why not unmoderate them instead
>> of removing them, if they get use, fair enough, if not, there is no
>> harm, no extra resources used other than a handful of bytes for a one
>> line entry in active file which already has thousands of unmoderated
>> groups that haven't been posted to in 10 years anway.
>
> The group lists are full of unused groups and that makes finding active
> groups much harder, so cleaning that up is always a good idea. We are
> here to discuss which of the groups might be still relevant and might
> be revived.

I totally agree