Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vmemsa$8r34$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:50:50 -0600 Organization: individual Lines: 107 Message-ID: <vmemsa$8r34$1@dont-email.me> References: <1VcgP.54962$XfF8.39289@fx04.iad> <vm1itg$1f1ma$3@dont-email.me> <vm40cl$21e8l$2@dont-email.me> <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com> <vm86er$2u8jo$1@dont-email.me> <cqlfoj93e6jvua3is08kbm6f9p32h8cl4a@4ax.com> <vm8o1d$313ov$1@dont-email.me> <d63goj9qcpdk1q2o6ah4r1sq5r776dfdb7@4ax.com> <vm976v$33jmh$1@dont-email.me> <vm9nn9$36us4$1@dont-email.me> <vma9mg$3d5vi$1@dont-email.me> <vmarak$3fd0d$3@dont-email.me> <vmbqro$3lkem$1@dont-email.me> <vmbu1k$3l86v$2@dont-email.me> <vmc2rf$3mmhi$1@dont-email.me> <vmcjff$3mpfr$2@dont-email.me> <vmd2ug$3v4of$1@dont-email.me> <vmeg75$68pk$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:50:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0592a23535fb1bb0936946040c2f0da3"; logging-data="289892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OXydwmLUtdarK7DVfNE7frclu4SJs4cE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ljiNsz2HHoUuePq33jR4ezVQWPk= In-Reply-To: <vmeg75$68pk$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR Bytes: 6066 On 1/17/25 2:57 PM, -hh wrote: > On 1/17/25 3:04 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: >> On 1/16/25 9:40 PM, -hh wrote: >>> On 1/16/25 5:56 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: >>>> On 1/16/25 3:34 PM, -hh wrote: >>>>> but $25K today buys a new Civic or another "budget" car. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> $25K car is a "budget" car these days? Hehe :-) >>> >>> New car, just like how the conversation was originally about new PCs. >>> >>> >>> And yes, 'budget' in the context of new car prices, since Edmunds' >>> 3Q24 report found that the average new car in the USA cost $47,542. >>> >>> And FYI, average used car price was $27,177. >>> >>> >>>> The last car I bought is a Toyota Echo 2002, in 2017, for $1600. >>> >>> Bully for you. Did it include a radio? My first car didn't. >> >> From today's craigslist: >> >> https://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/d/lewisville-2009-toyota-yaris- >> hatchback/7815953954.html >> >> 2009 Toyota Yaris. A nice used car for just $1500. Right there about >> 20 minutes drive from me to go get it. If I had any serious problem >> with my Echo 2002, I would jump on this one. >> >> A used car is worth, and priced, between $1500 to $2000. Anything >> above that is a rip off. A computer is worth between $70 and $80. >> >> And at the bottom of it, ANY car above $2000 and ANY computer above >> $80 is a rip off. New or used. That's my main point. You guys have >> bad habits. > > If something really is a "ripoff" depends on many more factors than > merely if it minimally meets your personal transportation needs. > > For example, when someone isn't personally handy with doing DIY roadside > repairs, how does that change selection criteria? Ditto for other > factors, such as to reliably arriving at work on time. Or driving > through remote regions without being stranded, or even just though > unsafe urban neighborhoods. Plus seating for how many passengers? Need > heat? Snow tires? Or summer A/C? Handicapped? There's a wide variety > of what constitutes "good enough" transportation across a population. > > And sure, one can keep a car running forever with enough maintenance, > but that's not free, nor constant per mile: as costs change and > accumulate, there's a cost-benefit trade-off decision for where > vehicular replacement can become the more fiscally prudent choice than > the sum of various maintenance costs (including time spent) to keep the > old Yaris on the road vs junking it and getting another one. > > Likewise, you can also choose to go buy another used vehicle with its > unknown history/reliability and spend whatever time & money again to > make it sufficiently reliable/etc ... but it again comes back to the > question of if that's how you want to spend your time vs pursuit of > other endeavors/interests. > > >> You guys have bad habits. You're like those psycho Shoe freaks. Or >> those who lose their savings buying stocks that aren't worth what >> they're paying for. You don't know what you're doing, and others >> smarter than you, or rather are simply healthy in mind, are taking >> advantage of that. > > Not at all, for much of the point here is that everything can be > simplified down to a "Make, or Buy" kind of decision point: want to > keep on making your DIY repairs on PCs & cars? No one is stopping you. > But trying to call everyone else a fool because they've not made the > same choices you have is what's inappropriate. Particularly for anyone > who's ever paid someone to prepare a meal instead of making it themselves. > > >> In how many different ways have I pointed to this fact? Blows my mind. > > As many as you think you'll have to, in order to keep deflecting from > the original "new vs new" cost comparison, and how PCs costs have come > way down in price ... because this also includes the used ones which > have also become cheaper over the years too. > > > -hh With some people I have to exaggerate to show my point. Movies do that too, by the way. The movie "American Psycho" tried to depict the same type of people that I said have bad habits. I remember one scene where a guy killed someone with an axe cause the latter's business card looked better than his. Some of you kill others to solve it. Some pay $80k for an automobile! I know what drives you.