Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmemsa$8r34$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:50:50 -0600
Organization: individual
Lines: 107
Message-ID: <vmemsa$8r34$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1VcgP.54962$XfF8.39289@fx04.iad> <vm1itg$1f1ma$3@dont-email.me>
 <vm40cl$21e8l$2@dont-email.me> <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com>
 <vm86er$2u8jo$1@dont-email.me> <cqlfoj93e6jvua3is08kbm6f9p32h8cl4a@4ax.com>
 <vm8o1d$313ov$1@dont-email.me> <d63goj9qcpdk1q2o6ah4r1sq5r776dfdb7@4ax.com>
 <vm976v$33jmh$1@dont-email.me> <vm9nn9$36us4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vma9mg$3d5vi$1@dont-email.me> <vmarak$3fd0d$3@dont-email.me>
 <vmbqro$3lkem$1@dont-email.me> <vmbu1k$3l86v$2@dont-email.me>
 <vmc2rf$3mmhi$1@dont-email.me> <vmcjff$3mpfr$2@dont-email.me>
 <vmd2ug$3v4of$1@dont-email.me> <vmeg75$68pk$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:50:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0592a23535fb1bb0936946040c2f0da3";
	logging-data="289892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OXydwmLUtdarK7DVfNE7frclu4SJs4cE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ljiNsz2HHoUuePq33jR4ezVQWPk=
In-Reply-To: <vmeg75$68pk$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
Bytes: 6066

On 1/17/25 2:57 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 1/17/25 3:04 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 1/16/25 9:40 PM, -hh wrote:
>>> On 1/16/25 5:56 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>> On 1/16/25 3:34 PM, -hh wrote:
>>>>> but $25K today buys a new Civic or another "budget" car.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $25K car is a "budget" car these days? Hehe :-)
>>>
>>> New car, just like how the conversation was originally about new PCs.
>>>
>>>
>>> And yes, 'budget' in the context of new car prices, since Edmunds' 
>>> 3Q24 report found that the average new car in the USA cost $47,542.
>>>
>>> And FYI, average used car price was $27,177.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The last car I bought is a Toyota Echo 2002, in 2017, for $1600. 
>>>
>>> Bully for you.  Did it include a radio?  My first car didn't.
>>
>>  From today's craigslist:
>>
>> https://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/d/lewisville-2009-toyota-yaris- 
>> hatchback/7815953954.html
>>
>> 2009 Toyota Yaris. A nice used car for just $1500. Right there about 
>> 20 minutes drive from me to go get it. If I had any serious problem 
>> with my Echo 2002, I would jump on this one.
>>
>> A used car is worth, and priced, between $1500 to $2000. Anything 
>> above that is a rip off. A computer is worth between $70 and $80.
>>
>> And at the bottom of it, ANY car above $2000 and ANY computer above 
>> $80 is a rip off. New or used. That's my main point.  You guys have 
>> bad habits.
> 
> If something really is a "ripoff" depends on many more factors than 
> merely if it minimally meets your personal transportation needs.
> 
> For example, when someone isn't personally handy with doing DIY roadside 
> repairs, how does that change selection criteria?  Ditto for other 
> factors, such as to reliably arriving at work on time.  Or driving 
> through remote regions without being stranded, or even just though 
> unsafe urban neighborhoods.  Plus seating for how many passengers?  Need 
> heat?  Snow tires?  Or summer A/C?  Handicapped?  There's a wide variety 
> of what constitutes "good enough" transportation across a population.
> 
> And sure, one can keep a car running forever with enough maintenance, 
> but that's not free, nor constant per mile:  as costs change and 
> accumulate, there's a cost-benefit trade-off decision for where 
> vehicular replacement can become the more fiscally prudent choice than 
> the sum of various maintenance costs (including time spent) to keep the 
> old Yaris on the road vs junking it and getting another one.
> 
> Likewise, you can also choose to go buy another used vehicle with its 
> unknown history/reliability and spend whatever time & money again to 
> make it sufficiently reliable/etc ... but it again comes back to the 
> question of if that's how you want to spend your time vs pursuit of 
> other endeavors/interests.
> 
> 
>> You guys have bad habits. You're like those psycho Shoe freaks. Or 
>> those who lose their savings buying stocks that aren't worth what 
>> they're paying for. You don't know what you're doing, and others 
>> smarter than you, or rather are simply healthy in mind, are taking 
>> advantage of that.
> 
> Not at all, for much of the point here is that everything can be 
> simplified down to a "Make, or Buy" kind of decision point:  want to 
> keep on making your DIY repairs on PCs & cars?  No one is stopping you. 
> But trying to call everyone else a fool because they've not made the 
> same choices you have is what's inappropriate.  Particularly for anyone 
> who's ever paid someone to prepare a meal instead of making it themselves.
> 
> 
>> In how many different ways have I pointed to this fact? Blows my mind.
> 
> As many as you think you'll have to, in order to keep deflecting from 
> the original "new vs new" cost comparison, and how PCs costs have come 
> way down in price ... because this also includes the used ones which 
> have also become cheaper over the years too.
> 
> 
> -hh


With some people I have to exaggerate to show my point.

Movies do that too, by the way. The movie "American Psycho" tried to 
depict the same type of people that I said have bad habits.

I remember one scene where a guy killed someone with an axe cause the 
latter's business card looked better than his.

Some of you kill others to solve it. Some pay $80k for an automobile! I 
know what drives you.