Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:12:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vmeo4s$9hcv$4@dont-email.me>
References: <_hycnQxlN5kAphr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<36bf96a5-527c-1d8b-a93b-6788cdd589a2@example.net>
	<1PKcna3Yf6vdFhX6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<b0808927-ab4c-5c09-69db-608552e94989@example.net>
	<vmapu2$3foi7$2@dont-email.me>
	<7b19252d-bfe8-9d48-0cd2-eb33e4a64179@example.net>
	<67897bb3@news.ausics.net> <vmdar7$8tl$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 00:12:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c86f741e93d2eabd222f396172e80b5a";
	logging-data="312735"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+8NqOvxaTs76anBgnsiVg"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5r4iTpC0Oxf29L6MAvhfUDCGZHw=
Bytes: 1631

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:19:19 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> ... my original point was that MIP for MIP ARM is having
> trouble outperforming *86 at lower power.

That should be “MIPS for MIPS”, but I don’t think that’s true. Otherwise 
Intel’s “Atom” chips would have been more competitive against ARM for use 
in Android devices than they were.