Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: No creation at 4000BC, nor evolution either
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:28:20 +1100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <jaf5llFagk9U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <d18a32dc-d46d-4b8b-8af9-c9940102ec9dn@googlegroups.com>
 <jaf110F9n6sU1@mid.individual.net>
 <16db2483-7062-427f-823c-80f2109655f2n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net cXcgmr5Is0uSFuUqhL/+Tg/Oc91cWCdgdflmqnx89JaKJm+kFI
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+IL4PoOdaFhR8NCS00Z4Oct8Zfg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <16db2483-7062-427f-823c-80f2109655f2n@googlegroups.com>
Bytes: 2151

On 29-Mar-22 11:32 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 11:09:10 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 29-Mar-22 10:12 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> https://mysteriesrunsolved.com/2020/07/guadeloupe-woman.html?fbclid=IwAR1xWsp1rNLb9CxVn9Kkgnze53D3Hg_5uZtw2oRKnUOH7Dpo-d-6RKmAheg
>>>
>>> This validates my stand about the size of the universe, and the nature of time. Infinite, without beginning or end, respectively.
>> Presumably you didn't read where is says "it appears more likely that
>> most of this is either hoaxed evidence or misinterpretation of natural
>> phenomena".
> 
> I did that and my comment in another post  was:
> Lame.
> Just like your silly objections to my brilliant new experiments:
> Lame.
> The undeniable facts are there in the text.
> Carbon dating has to show that it is older than the rock around it. Wonder if they will do it, probably not.
> Unnecessay though, for no one at that time could manufacture it and it has been under supervision and thoroughly examined by experts.

Carbon dating is not usable over anything like the timescale required.

Sylvia.