Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmh8ju$13eic$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS Excel Working As Designed
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 16:05:50 -0600
Organization: individual
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vmh8ju$13eic$6@dont-email.me>
References: <181b83589a58e91d$131121$32720$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <spqdnTWpWv8iUhf6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <vmenu5$9hcv$2@dont-email.me>
 <-L6dnZ9Zr8JUdBf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <vmf5b6$d902$2@dont-email.me>
 <1EqdnRxxt-P-shb6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@supernews.com>
 <vmfj0d$l143$2@dont-email.me>
 <pan$5d96e$34c92047$70937d81$369bb226@linux.rocks>
 <vmh1b9$13eic$1@dont-email.me>
 <pan$87701$d80b1c3d$a2d2d014$f11d7fd6@linux.rocks>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:05:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c8023458bd2a4de111a1a27b1a14c165";
	logging-data="1161804"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZP+6evXEVwLZRYvpWFFw/79i/8G55/3w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z8USblTjX95sw6MOUT97pq4JvjY=
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
In-Reply-To: <pan$87701$d80b1c3d$a2d2d014$f11d7fd6@linux.rocks>
Bytes: 2828

On 1/18/25 3:02 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 14:01:45 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>>
>> And that's why it sells. MS did that with DOS too. MS is a business not
>> an R&D institution.
>>
> 
> If you know about the history of Microslop, their mantra in the
> early years was: "Windows ain't done until Lotus won't run."
> 
> The goal of Microslop was to eliminate the superior Lotus 123
> and the superior WordPerfect by leveraging their dominance
> on the desktop.
> 
>  From the very beginning, Microslop was a corrupt, anti-competitive
> organization that did not desire to produce superior products.
> Their whole anti-competitive strategy was to quash their superior
> rivals.
> 
> But did the average ignoramus asshole computer user ever notice?
> 
> Nope.  And that Microslop's only advantage.
> 
> 
> 


I think those Capones even killed the developer of what they copied 
their DOS from. The Capones were afraid he'll one day, this time 
successfully, sue them when court of law will get better adjusted to new 
tech realities.

But, when there are Capones around you, and yes they're all around you, 
you can begin outsmarting them. Capones feed on the Sheep. If you're not 
Sheep, you can outsmart them cause a "Capone" by definition has funny 
weak points too. Weak points that healthy human beings don't have.