Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vmh8ju$13eic$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: MS Excel Working As Designed Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 16:05:50 -0600 Organization: individual Lines: 39 Message-ID: <vmh8ju$13eic$6@dont-email.me> References: <181b83589a58e91d$131121$32720$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <spqdnTWpWv8iUhf6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com> <vmenu5$9hcv$2@dont-email.me> <-L6dnZ9Zr8JUdBf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@supernews.com> <vmf5b6$d902$2@dont-email.me> <1EqdnRxxt-P-shb6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@supernews.com> <vmfj0d$l143$2@dont-email.me> <pan$5d96e$34c92047$70937d81$369bb226@linux.rocks> <vmh1b9$13eic$1@dont-email.me> <pan$87701$d80b1c3d$a2d2d014$f11d7fd6@linux.rocks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:05:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c8023458bd2a4de111a1a27b1a14c165"; logging-data="1161804"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZP+6evXEVwLZRYvpWFFw/79i/8G55/3w=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z8USblTjX95sw6MOUT97pq4JvjY= Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR In-Reply-To: <pan$87701$d80b1c3d$a2d2d014$f11d7fd6@linux.rocks> Bytes: 2828 On 1/18/25 3:02 PM, Farley Flud wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 14:01:45 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> >> And that's why it sells. MS did that with DOS too. MS is a business not >> an R&D institution. >> > > If you know about the history of Microslop, their mantra in the > early years was: "Windows ain't done until Lotus won't run." > > The goal of Microslop was to eliminate the superior Lotus 123 > and the superior WordPerfect by leveraging their dominance > on the desktop. > > From the very beginning, Microslop was a corrupt, anti-competitive > organization that did not desire to produce superior products. > Their whole anti-competitive strategy was to quash their superior > rivals. > > But did the average ignoramus asshole computer user ever notice? > > Nope. And that Microslop's only advantage. > > > I think those Capones even killed the developer of what they copied their DOS from. The Capones were afraid he'll one day, this time successfully, sue them when court of law will get better adjusted to new tech realities. But, when there are Capones around you, and yes they're all around you, you can begin outsmarting them. Capones feed on the Sheep. If you're not Sheep, you can outsmart them cause a "Capone" by definition has funny weak points too. Weak points that healthy human beings don't have.