Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:32:32 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <vmik7d$23bj0$2@dont-email.me>
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com>
 <1819b35cb5854fb7$83258$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <17a125a3e75f42ff91ef08afdab4e0a9@www.novabbs.com>
 <1819b79e1aa58c97$89507$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com>
 <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com>
 <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com>
 <vm3ncs$20493$1@dont-email.me>
 <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com>
 <vm6lel$2jd9o$1@dont-email.me>
 <4568ec448c26221aea0c57a6bfc7b29b@www.novabbs.com>
 <vm8bd2$2v29k$1@dont-email.me>
 <735acd1678938a0da82e207ed024d0fc@www.novabbs.com>
 <vmbmj0$3kl6v$2@dont-email.me>
 <e90bec1392317cfbacad0c2cd137b90e@www.novabbs.com>
 <vmg9db$rvu7$1@dont-email.me>
 <264d3517a178c823b9ec2c973f08cd99@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:30:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="473b5ceaf7fd39c595a99823dc52af81";
	logging-data="2207328"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Gr3bdYx6zd6tcTEew45/R"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3nrE4u9AED/4yk4JMvWuybZLDdE=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <264d3517a178c823b9ec2c973f08cd99@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 3571

Den 18.01.2025 22:30, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 13:15:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>> The equation for the total deflection is:
>>    Θₜ = 4GM/Δ⋅c²
>> where:
>>   Δ = the impact parameter, closest approach to Sun
>>   c = speed of light in vacuum
>>   G = gravitational constant
>>   M = solar mass
>>      
>> The equation for the deflection observed from the Earth is:
>>   Θ = (2GM/Δ⋅c²)⋅(1 + cosφ)
>> where:
>>  φ  = angle Star-Sun as observed from the Earth
>>
>> This equation is derived from the equation for total deflection
>> with a bit of geometry.
>>
>> These equations are thoroughly confirmed to be correct because
>> experiments have shown that their predictions are correct within
>> the precision of the measurements, which are in the order of ±0.005%.
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>>
>>
>> Do you really believe that the derivation was wrong but
>> the result of the derivation was right?

> Paul you're doing astrology. I suppose you can tell my Sun sign!

 From your failure to answer the question I can tell you your answer:

  "Yes, I Laurence Clark Crossen believe that the derivation of
   the equation  Θₜ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² from GR is wrong, even if I know
   that the the equation Θₜ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is correct."

Wasn't I correct?  Or was I correct? :-D


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/