Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Hello!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 12:04:05 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vmim75$25cjo$2@dont-email.me>
References: <6FFviQWSDMpB-lC7jH8drZAhwsk@jntp> <vmhluq$19o87$1@dont-email.me>
 <cmPlEF6ZE1x588YNcdCJETuzpF8@jntp>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 12:04:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="da9c4019aaa1365897d22a299780b2ea";
	logging-data="2273912"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9krhcL+Ps4Snlwobu7vjF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/Mtve54YrvmyBbDbLEJgT6xULSE=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <cmPlEF6ZE1x588YNcdCJETuzpF8@jntp>
Bytes: 1654

Am 19.01.2025 um 08:51 schrieb Richard Hachel:

> But nevertheless, I continue to certify that there is an extremely fine 
> mathematical error, at the moment when physicists pose
> i²=-1 to quickly simplify what seems a convenient operation.

Nope. i² = -1 was not invented/introduced by physicists, but by 
mathematicians.

> Because as long as we do not know what i is worth, which can be BOTH 
> equal to 1 or -1 in this imaginary mathematics, we [...]

i is neither 1 nor -1.

Hint: If it were 1 or -1 we would get i² = 1 (in bot cases).

..
..
..