| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vmjikn$2ehtf$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Remember That Empty Reservoir in L.A.? Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:09:09 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <vmjikn$2ehtf$1@dont-email.me> References: <vmhu2p$1fus6$1@dont-email.me> <vmi2c9$5jon$1@solani.org> <7p6pojpbrksbrk7s23g4t75m946vfiu5o2@4ax.com> <vmjge9$2dt9m$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:09:11 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f92e743ff2f148cb713b002380bc1ba7"; logging-data="2574255"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+dcJhGmdNivvau3m2rbHpUagixTYD1ptU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BZAwuruUAz/mwtajpRh0SoR6tj4= In-Reply-To: <vmjge9$2dt9m$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3629 On 1/19/2025 1:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jan 18, 2025 at 10:29:20 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 21:25:30 -0800, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/2025 8:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> Well, it's still empty and the Santa Anas are expected to kick up again next >>>> week. >>>> >>>> Bad enough that it was empty the first time around but they've had two weeks >>>> to fill it and not one drop has been sent up there in that time. >>>> >>>> The three million gallons LAFD had to work with before the hydrants ran dry >>>> lasted them 17 hours. If they'd had the 117 million gallons in that >>>> reservoir >>>> available, a little quick math indicates it would have lasted 663 hours >>>> before >>>> running out. That's 28 days. >>>> >>>> Oh, and have I mentioned that we only have half the fire department we need? >>>> The National Fire Institute, which sets standards for municipal fire >>>> departments nationwide, says you need 1.8 firefighters for every 1000 >>>> residents. Los Angeles has 0.9. Exactly half of what a city this size needs. >>>> We're also 62 fire stations short of what is recommended. Sixty-fucking-two. >>>> But never fear! We've met and *exceeded* our quota of DEI executives, so >>>> that's reassuring. >>>> >>>> I swear to god, these 'progressive' Democrats in charge of the place are >>>> actively trying to destroy the city. I mean, if it was your goal to destroy >>>> Los Angeles, what would you do differently? >>>> >>>> >>> I thought it was under repair? Maybe they're not done yet and ready to >>> fill it. >> >> Just looked up an article over on the web and got the following quote: >> >> "Officials said that the Santa Ynez Reservoir had been closed since >> about February for repairs to its cover, leaving a 117-million-gallon >> water storage complex empty in the heart of the Palisades for nearly a >> year. " >> >> So the reservoir was still undergoing repair long before the Santa >> Ana winds started up. > > The *cover* was under repair, not the reservoir. It could still have been > filled with water as fire season approached. The only thing the cover does is > keep things like twigs and bird poop from getting into the water, making it > unsafe to drink. It could still be used to put out fires. If the basin needed maintenance too, maybe doing both made sense.