Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vml18e$2vpkd$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: battery fire Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:24:46 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 87 Message-ID: <vml18e$2vpkd$1@dont-email.me> References: <jqrkojlsnkbnilv90tbap8qio7obqo7cde@4ax.com> <vmeisf$7ugc$1@dont-email.me> <vmfqqo$mdeq$1@dont-email.me> <1r6cqml.vq4fh9uef02N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vmi0i8$1gaqc$4@dont-email.me> <vmi9du$1ionp$1@dont-email.me> <vmigu0$23uqt$1@dont-email.me> <daupoj9e9ptm52s6t4jh3jpt0r3067gb26@4ax.com> <vmj57u$2aa3n$1@dont-email.me> <vmjb89$1tgq1$3@dont-email.me> <vmjsuu$2hns0$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:24:47 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="023414903b1ebca622907e4d596062a5"; logging-data="3139213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/W+fdcvFnR6EZ8tCa1Lz+sgEW4oh2Pcw8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:f0uuy/BziIiGjvMTmjmqdxYtw3o= In-Reply-To: <vmjsuu$2hns0$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 4925 On 19/01/2025 22:09, Jeroen Belleman wrote: > On 1/19/25 18:03, Jeff Layman wrote: >> On 19/01/2025 15:24, Jeroen Belleman wrote: >>> On 1/19/25 14:09, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:38:17 +0100, Jeroen Belleman >>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/19/25 08:25, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: >>>>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On 18/01/2025 9:37 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>>>>>> Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2025 21:42, Martin Brown wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lithium ion battery fires are virtually impossible to put out - >>>>>>>>>> you have >>>>>>>>>> to let them burn out and use boundary cooling on the neighbouring >>>>>>>>>> modules with copious amounts of water. Looks like this one >>>>>>>>>> managed to >>>>>>>>>> get away from the fire fighters (which isn't supposed to happen). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have no problem building large windmills at sea. Why not >>>>>>>>> build the >>>>>>>>> lithium storage facilities off the coast too? The capital cost >>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>> higher, but once built they could be maintained in a similar way to >>>>>>>>> those on land. And if one caught fire, there's plenty of water >>>>>>>>> around to >>>>>>>>> put the fire out, or at least keep it under control. For even >>>>>>>>> greater >>>>>>>>> safety - and expense - they could be built as submerged facilities, >>>>>>>>> where any fire could be dealt with in seconds by opening a valve >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> letting sea water flood the building. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I seem to remember from my chemistry lessons that lithium reacts >>>>>>>> violently with water. Containing lithium pollution of large >>>>>>>> areas of >>>>>>>> the sea in stormy conditions (which is when catastrophic failure >>>>>>>> is most >>>>>>>> likely to occur) might be quite difficult. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It wasn't lithium but sodium. Potassium was even worse. Lithium does >>>>>>> react in a similar way, but it schools didn't keep stocks of lithium >>>>>>> metal around fifty years ago, and probably still don't. >>>>>> >>>>>> What that word salad was supposed to mean? >>>>>> >>>>>> Lithium reacts violently with water. Furtermore, it is lighter than >>>>>> ANY >>>>>> liquid known to a man so it floats in EVERYTHING you could put on >>>>>> it. But >>>>>> wait, there is more -- that black crust that it gets covered with >>>>>> in no time >>>>>> when subjected to air is not oxide but NITRIDE. Unlike sodium and >>>>>> potassium >>>>>> lithium readily reacts with both oxygen and nitrogen and it burns >>>>>> spectacularly even in pure nitrogen, without any oxygen present. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From direct experience, I know it is quite stable in dry air. >>>>> It tarnishes in seconds in air with normal humidity levels, >>>>> and yes, it reacts violently with water. >>>>> >>>>> Jeroen Belleman >>>> >>>> Depends. Yes, violently if confined, but merely vigorously if allowed >>>> to skate around on the surface expelling energy. >>> >>> Have you actually seen it? >>> >>> I have. (It was thick foil, not a lump, and it was not confined.) >>> >>> Violent is the word that's fitting. >> >> But no worse than dropping a mint (Mento) into a coke bottle. Did the >> lithium foil reaction result in any fire? >> > > Yes. I stand corrected. There are circumstances when lithium metal and water can result in a (hydrogen) fire, with quite a few examples from an internet search. -- Jeff