| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vmlmi9$364is$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Typical Globlist Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 01:28:24 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <vmlmi9$364is$2@dont-email.me> References: <tclfojdbm3hgnsl2ioksub8vvvo4cv0fkh@4ax.com> <hrsfoj9q20ebv62q3g0fvo6a9v0sqfhtcu@4ax.com> <bh1gojp2q5iab60tb46b7lcan9svb7c265@4ax.com> <1fhjojtghglio037es1sbi7qh7viqffgk0@4ax.com> <u36lojlpj15nsgo8p0fp696jgvbbtf8n5f@4ax.com> <j8kmojp1kdf214b5e7apl9gp5nkf28kvmp@4ax.com> <vmi11t$1gpah$1@dont-email.me> <1r6ej8o.1ubf1cba2c7nkN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <7eupoj9ji7vl3tiusfl50d562hktuggcv1@4ax.com> <d98qoj558p5qvmagl31kj34fuamdjequc7@4ax.com> <n6fqoj9tvdbvvar07233kdso5q8quqfvua@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:28:26 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2759154223c08acacbe575a18b5b1b6f"; logging-data="3347036"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18B/mCfitAeNYyHwopNfA4cq6q/9HzknEY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VBgliTFye+5S9sMNVOcw8zHTazc= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250119-6, 20/1/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <n6fqoj9tvdbvvar07233kdso5q8quqfvua@4ax.com> Bytes: 3840 On 20/01/2025 5:01 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:17:12 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:49:31 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>> >>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>>> The proposition that radiant heat generated by one burning would set off >>>>> an adjacent house is pretty dumb. Fire codes are written to make sure >>>>> that houses aren't vulnerable in that way. >>>> >>>> In that case, what spread the fire? >>> >>> Airborne embers I would guess. >> >> That shouldn't be allowed to happen, but the breeze was offshore when >> that seaside strip burned. > > Are the Santa Annas always offshore? I mean as in *invariably* > offshore? > >> Sloman snipped my link of course. He does that when reality interferes >> with his theories. > > Just another good reason not to waste time trying to argue with him. > Aren't you happier now you don't interract with the damn fool any > more? It was a good idea, that deal we did, I reckon. If you like living inside a mutual admiration society and approving each other's fatuous, but ever-so-emotionally-satisfying nonsense. >> There's a forestry department that inspects every property and issues >> periodic reports too. >> >> Humans have known about fire for dozens of years by now. > > Indeed! It would appear the building codes badly need updating to take > the natural, cyclical climate change which is taking place into > account. We didn't get to find out about the natural cyclical variation until anthropogenic global warming made looking carefully at the climate a matter of urgency. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_multidecadal_oscillation That particular cyclic variation wasn't even named until 2000, when it was labelled by Michael Mann of hockey-stick fame. The unnatural anthropogenic global warming the Cursitor Doom and John Larkin are foolishly skeptical about is an even bigger menace, but they prefer to ignore it. -- Bil Sloman, Sydney