| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vmln6b$364is$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Typical Globlist Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 01:39:06 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <vmln6b$364is$4@dont-email.me> References: <bh1gojp2q5iab60tb46b7lcan9svb7c265@4ax.com> <1fhjojtghglio037es1sbi7qh7viqffgk0@4ax.com> <u36lojlpj15nsgo8p0fp696jgvbbtf8n5f@4ax.com> <j8kmojp1kdf214b5e7apl9gp5nkf28kvmp@4ax.com> <vmi11t$1gpah$1@dont-email.me> <1r6ej8o.1ubf1cba2c7nkN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <7eupoj9ji7vl3tiusfl50d562hktuggcv1@4ax.com> <d98qoj558p5qvmagl31kj34fuamdjequc7@4ax.com> <n6fqoj9tvdbvvar07233kdso5q8quqfvua@4ax.com> <f5hqoj1abc7seofnhr3kl3o701n7jmqs7b@4ax.com> <usvqojdieu2rkrlqol0fi4arllqpr7ge62@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:39:07 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2759154223c08acacbe575a18b5b1b6f"; logging-data="3347036"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IkAmtLXRwhXBPNQqPkXGW7i43jaGmFiU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:LJnbVe0pJ+O07NeNo6Eqcq4BLvo= In-Reply-To: <usvqojdieu2rkrlqol0fi4arllqpr7ge62@4ax.com> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250119-6, 20/1/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3000 On 20/01/2025 9:44 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:45:07 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:01:17 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:17:12 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:49:31 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: <snip> >>>> Sloman snipped my link of course. He does that when reality interferes >>>> with his theories. >>> >>> Just another good reason not to waste time trying to argue with him. >>> Aren't you happier now you don't interract with the damn fool any >>> more? It was a good idea, that deal we did, I reckon. >> >> I might respond if he said something interesting and intelligent about >> electronic design, which is highly improbable. > > Bad idea. He'll start throwing in barbs and before you know it, you've > been hooked and sucked in again. Old Bill's a master angler! But you don't catch John Larkin with posts about circuit design. He is only interested in the circuits he has slung together himself. Cursitor Doom doesn't have a clue about that, because he doesn't follow that kind of thread. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney