Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:30:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID: <vmm88o$37o79$1@news.xmission.com>
References: <vmeibp$33sam$1@news.xmission.com> <wwvsepessby.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vml5ol$31d1s$1@dont-email.me> <vmlmkp$36kmo$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:30:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4";
	logging-data="3399913"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Bytes: 1579
Lines: 15

In article <vmlmkp$36kmo$1@dont-email.me>,
Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
>Muttley@dastardlyhq.org wrote:
>> On a slight tangent, does anyone know of a good
>> reference for how to use the ptrace() call on
>> Linux? The man page is somewhat obtuse.
>
>Just guessing, but I can only think of reading
>gdb source code.

Or strace.
-- 
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long.  As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs.  In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
	http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/Infallibility