Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vmmace$3d9ms$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Remember That Empty Reservoir in L.A.? Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:06:38 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <vmmace$3d9ms$1@dont-email.me> References: <vmhu2p$1fus6$1@dont-email.me> <vmi2c9$5jon$1@solani.org> <7p6pojpbrksbrk7s23g4t75m946vfiu5o2@4ax.com> <vmjeq2$6gbh$1@solani.org> Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:06:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="65c8b565c0bf21975efd382443c21702"; logging-data="3581660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DHqtmLwZeVRtObrL0QN2NoCbL+rAjjm4=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:NEzcTlD01+Hj/e59UEtuCcYCNxo= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 3450 suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >On 1/18/2025 10:29 PM, shawn wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 21:25:30 -0800, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/2025 8:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> Well, it's still empty and the Santa Anas are expected to kick up again next >>>> week. >>>> >>>> Bad enough that it was empty the first time around but they've had two weeks >>>> to fill it and not one drop has been sent up there in that time. >>>> >>>> The three million gallons LAFD had to work with before the hydrants ran dry >>>> lasted them 17 hours. If they'd had the 117 million gallons in that >reservoir >>>> available, a little quick math indicates it would have lasted 663 >hours before >>>> running out. That's 28 days. >>>> >>>> Oh, and have I mentioned that we only have half the fire department we need? >>>> The National Fire Institute, which sets standards for municipal fire >>>> departments nationwide, says you need 1.8 firefighters for every 1000 >>>> residents. Los Angeles has 0.9. Exactly half of what a city this size needs. >>>> We're also 62 fire stations short of what is recommended. Sixty-fucking-two. >>>> But never fear! We've met and *exceeded* our quota of DEI executives, so >>>> that's reassuring. >>>> >>>> I swear to god, these 'progressive' Democrats in charge of the place are >>>> actively trying to destroy the city. I mean, if it was your goal to destroy >>>> Los Angeles, what would you do differently? >>>> >>>> >>> I thought it was under repair? Maybe they're not done yet and ready to >>> fill it. >> >> Just looked up an article over on the web and got the following quote: >> >> "Officials said that the Santa Ynez Reservoir had been closed since >> about February for repairs to its cover, leaving a 117-million-gallon >> water storage complex empty in the heart of the Palisades for nearly a >> year. " >> >> So the reservoir was still undergoing repair long before the Santa >> Ana winds started up. No reason was given why the repairs were taking >> so long but I know how that can go. The pool in my complex has been >> undergoing repair work for over a couple of months. There are multiple >> guys here every day. I have no idea why it's taking so long but they >> keep working. >> >Huh, maybe lacck of funding in LA? Repair and maintenance on a timely basis is unaffordable but we can afford fire damage? Is that how politicians think?