Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmmfsk$3et6v$7@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:40:40 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vmmfsk$3et6v$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vm40cl$21e8l$2@dont-email.me>
 <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com>
 <HHghP.135123$5c34.129668@fx47.iad>
 <la6bojl7t4686ll2teomlj0ig70ma8o8c8@4ax.com>
 <Q3hhP.45732$nlJ1.37298@fx41.iad>
 <ru7bojpl0j6ot182uuhhvrakcflqsadi30@4ax.com> <vm4kho$28of2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vm7m77$2rnlk$2@dont-email.me> <2jlfoj1ik2eptf57n2vtpfcsjhnmjc2pd8@4ax.com>
 <luqtrgFijddU4@mid.individual.net>
 <9makojd8r7e9klc4rf4nhisgeaei61v2ue@4ax.com>
 <6htiP.1615764$bYV2.1013803@fx17.iad>
 <1kukoj5ah84vq4dkapg6goe0ftgl2rt40s@4ax.com>
 <afviP.46705$nlJ1.34386@fx41.iad> <vmel1r$8i60$5@dont-email.me>
 <PxBiP.872812$DYF8.294102@fx14.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:40:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3231a34c84279bb4c44a8bbdc288cdf4";
	logging-data="3634399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19uCgm8ZOlrefOQyhwze5tN"
User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:61kMrABAddWQY+PT+QTCoSStur0=
In-Reply-To: <PxBiP.872812$DYF8.294102@fx14.iad>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2442

On 1/17/2025 6:17 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 1/17/25 5:19 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 1/17/2025 11:07 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing that if there is a significant problem in Linux and there 
>>> is a reason to fix it, they will. I emphasize the adjective 
>>> _significant_ there, not the ridiculous "issues" DFS has with 
>>> LibreOffice Calc. 
>>
>> Which ridiculous issues are you referring to?
> 
> I didn't pay enough attention to your constant complaints about 
> LibreOffice Calc and database software to record them.


I haven't complained specifically about Calc too much.  It's barely 
acceptable, if you can't afford $25 for a recent version of MS Office/Excel.

But LO Base should've been removed from LibreOffice years ago.