Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vmmfsk$3et6v$7@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:40:40 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <vmmfsk$3et6v$7@dont-email.me> References: <vm40cl$21e8l$2@dont-email.me> <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com> <HHghP.135123$5c34.129668@fx47.iad> <la6bojl7t4686ll2teomlj0ig70ma8o8c8@4ax.com> <Q3hhP.45732$nlJ1.37298@fx41.iad> <ru7bojpl0j6ot182uuhhvrakcflqsadi30@4ax.com> <vm4kho$28of2$1@dont-email.me> <vm7m77$2rnlk$2@dont-email.me> <2jlfoj1ik2eptf57n2vtpfcsjhnmjc2pd8@4ax.com> <luqtrgFijddU4@mid.individual.net> <9makojd8r7e9klc4rf4nhisgeaei61v2ue@4ax.com> <6htiP.1615764$bYV2.1013803@fx17.iad> <1kukoj5ah84vq4dkapg6goe0ftgl2rt40s@4ax.com> <afviP.46705$nlJ1.34386@fx41.iad> <vmel1r$8i60$5@dont-email.me> <PxBiP.872812$DYF8.294102@fx14.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:40:37 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3231a34c84279bb4c44a8bbdc288cdf4"; logging-data="3634399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19uCgm8ZOlrefOQyhwze5tN" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Cancel-Lock: sha1:61kMrABAddWQY+PT+QTCoSStur0= In-Reply-To: <PxBiP.872812$DYF8.294102@fx14.iad> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2442 On 1/17/2025 6:17 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 1/17/25 5:19 PM, DFS wrote: >> On 1/17/2025 11:07 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> I'm seeing that if there is a significant problem in Linux and there >>> is a reason to fix it, they will. I emphasize the adjective >>> _significant_ there, not the ridiculous "issues" DFS has with >>> LibreOffice Calc. >> >> Which ridiculous issues are you referring to? > > I didn't pay enough attention to your constant complaints about > LibreOffice Calc and database software to record them. I haven't complained specifically about Calc too much. It's barely acceptable, if you can't afford $25 for a recent version of MS Office/Excel. But LO Base should've been removed from LibreOffice years ago.