Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Division of two complex numbers
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:55:49 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vmmgp6$3f4ok$3@dont-email.me>
References: <zMjaMvWZUkHX6SOb195JTQnVpSA@jntp>
 <XmWkVwNVTy8QHqeS0TsrPZNuk_c@jntp> <vmmden$3e97a$1@dont-email.me>
 <GKkg17e0FiGdEqKCQvNrtvN0OLY@jntp> <vmmdso$3e97a$2@dont-email.me>
 <q-ufmQf4sCFn4XF8BtUedW5gSA8@jntp> <vmmf64$3e97a$3@dont-email.me>
 <vmmfk9$3emg6$2@dont-email.me> <vmmg8s$3e97a$5@dont-email.me>
 <vmmgg5$3f4ok$1@dont-email.me> <ozaL8QC8SzBmz3Q43kJyx4bkO7U@jntp>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:55:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a448e8983be0a6b337b635e01f87c515";
	logging-data="3642132"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tYYJxKnif/SW2S3jOtXFB"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HGm0Rim14NyaPp+me7bYksy+D/c=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <ozaL8QC8SzBmz3Q43kJyx4bkO7U@jntp>
Bytes: 2336

Am 20.01.2025 um 22:52 schrieb Python:
> Le 20/01/2025 à 22:51, Moebius a écrit :
>> Am 20.01.2025 um 22:47 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

>>> Sorry for missing something here. The division of complex numbers?
>>
>> You are missing what Python told you:
>>
>>       The  discussion is not about that it can be done, even crank Hachel
>>       would admit this. It is *why* it makes sense to define
>>       multiplication *that way* [i.e the usualy way --Moebius].
>>
>> Again:
>>
>>        Hachel didn't write that it cannot be done (he's not that silly),
>>        he claimed (wrongly) that it is the wrong way to define
>>        multiplication between complex numbers.
>>
>> See?!
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
> 
> Maybe autistic syndrome?

Well, just a a person that is not identical with you or me. :-P

He's thinking "like a programmer". ;-)

..
..
..