Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmubkm$1qf2q$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: To All The Micro$oft Fat Mouths
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:17:10 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <vmubkm$1qf2q$3@dont-email.me>
References: <181c6665cdacd782$115936$445945$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <vmm3qv$3b2am$1@dont-email.me> <5vatojtkltme7jqei2ct4th8dkmo9b6mn7@4ax.com>
 <zfyjP.662408$FOb4.645903@fx15.iad> <vmnfm3$3s4es$3@dont-email.me>
 <zwNjP.1733435$bYV2.402179@fx17.iad> <vmq5ba$rcn6$1@dont-email.me>
 <Kx6kP.915786$DPl.445810@fx13.iad> <vmsqoh$1h7qa$1@dont-email.me>
 <vMrkP.1060721$DPl.904421@fx13.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:17:11 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="74927972495777e5ebc35553e63c7702";
	logging-data="1915994"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Y9A6dTuKv87XPASfAmdja"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AL2OJ0PWNiB7fkqPiRaiAowR3Wo=
Bytes: 4511

On 2025-01-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 1/23/25 2:22 AM, RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 1/22/25 2:05 AM, RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/21/25 1:43 AM, RonB wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-01-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/20/25 3:03 PM, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2025 7:29 AM, Lameass Loser Larry Pietraskiewicz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> build us a perfect Pan version
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Somebody hep me get a Windows GUI!  You know I can't post witout a GUI
>>>>>>>>> Momma!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Distro Pan hard to use.  Forte Agent under Wine very nice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pan is very simple, but also very clunky. It looks like a teenager's
>>>>>>> high school Visual Basic project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, it's not slrn, but I thought it was pretty good when I ran it several
>>>>>> years ago. It reminded a lot of Xnews, which is what I used way back in my
>>>>>> Windows' days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Much like a Visual Basic project, it does the job. I'm not a fan of its
>>>>> filter system, but it is otherwise lean and useful.
>>>>
>>>> Pan's filter system is pretty much like slrn's — it's pretty powerful.
>>>
>>> Sure, but not user-friendly in the least. You can figure out how to
>>> configure it through a series of searches on the Internet, but most of
>>> what you would want to do can't be done from within the program. Much of
>>> it requires you to edit the configuration file and to know, before you
>>> start, what patterns to use to get things accomplished. At least in
>>> Thunderbird's case, it works without any confusion. It still has that
>>> bug that the filters won't work until you unsubscribe and resubscribe to
>>> a group, but otherwise it's perfect.
>> 
>> After looking up slrn vs Pan filters, I found out that (although the filters
>> look a lot alike) there are two different "interpreters" at work. Slrn uses
>> something called S-Lang while Pan uses something PCRE. Apparently simple
>> filters will interchange, but the more complicated ones won't. Or something
>> like that...
>> 
>> https://news.software.readers.narkive.com/k3fYPwcP/pan-and-slrn-score-files-the-difference
>> 
>> So I guess that's that. Although I found both Pan and slrn filters can be
>> auto-generated (mostly) and what I couldn't figure out in slrn, could be
>> solved an Internet search that provided the answer fairly quickly. I would
>> have to know more about what filters you're creating in Thunderbird to know
>> if the filter was easily reproducible in slrn.
>
> It doesn't matter since I have no interest in using a CLI tool to 
> navigate through Usenet anyway. Additionally, it would reveal to the 
> people I'm filtering _how_ I'm doing it, so they would easily circumvent 
> those filters.

I understand that. That's why I don't post the filter that I think does the 
job for me. But CLI is better (just saying). :)

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien