Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vmv6km$22ou8$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.killfile.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Paradoxes
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:57:58 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vmv6km$22ou8$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vlt8mu$h46e$1@dont-email.me> <vlu0b5$lfhs$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlve01$som5$2@dont-email.me> <vm0n1k$16lsd$2@dont-email.me>
 <vm0r7q$178hu$1@dont-email.me> <vm7sd5$2sled$1@dont-email.me>
 <pvdhojpi9mdffqp9qah9im4fbq1t6i9m26@4ax.com> <vmah23$3e6d8$2@dont-email.me>
 <avjhoj5mt2mfdcpotq0rqops96jl212hfi@4ax.com> <vmdhjr$15ag$2@dont-email.me>
 <rslkojplv5j2sg9d9pecthfutp0tmdc285@4ax.com> <vmence$9594$1@dont-email.me>
 <vmpmr3$ia8q$1@dont-email.me> <vmqoq0$10mf5$2@dont-email.me>
 <vmv0pd$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="15655"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UQDUQDvr9mumR7UPNAOVrQupoMY=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 14F1122978C; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:58:08 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95885229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:58:05 -0500 (EST)
	by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 50O4w0Cb1543388
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 05:58:02 +0100
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD3760601
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 04:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/8DD3760601; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id 33E27DC01CA; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 05:57:59 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 05:57:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vmv0pd$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me>
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18bhCjUwA3AB1q9W5iygma6qHkiQ8jB6Y0=
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 4217

On 24/01/2025 2:17 pm, Mark Isaak wrote:
> On 1/22/25 4:37 AM, MarkE wrote:
>> On 22/01/2025 1:56 pm, Mark Isaak wrote:
>>> On 1/17/25 2:59 PM, MarkE wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's a serious question regarding nonintervention, from genuine 
>>>> wondering on my part. It seems to me there are different forms of 
>>>> theistic evolution with respect to intervention, which might be 
>>>> characterised as:
>>>>
>>>> 1. E.g. speciation "download" (significant interventions; detectable)
>>>> 2. Nudging the molecules (subtle interventions; detectable in 
>>>> principle)
>>>> 3. Quantum event loading (probabilistic interventions; undetectable?)
>>>> 4. Pure front-loading (initial intervention only; undetectable)
>>>
>>> I take issue with your nomenclature. Those items (1-4) are not forms 
>>> of theistic anything. They are forms of unknown superpower 
>>> intervention. Even if one of those scenarios is fact, there is no 
>>> reason to say that the actor behind it is a god.
>>>
>>
>> I'm okay with "God" equals "unknown superpower" for the purpose of 
>> this discussion.
> 
> You seem to have a very naturalistic view of God.
> 

I'm really just acknowledging that, in this context, it's only possible 
to make a generic reference to the inferred supernatural agent.