| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vmvp5j$24ph9$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: People Without Meaningful Lives Seek Power Over Others Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:14:13 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 73 Message-ID: <vmvp5j$24ph9$2@dont-email.me> References: <lv9dihFtb61U1@mid.individual.net> <vmocrb$5grk$4@dont-email.me> <vmoj1l$7kk7$1@dont-email.me> <vmokki$8agt$1@dont-email.me> <vmol95$8ei6$1@dont-email.me> <zwgkP.176573$vfee.122746@fx45.iad> <vmsbhb$1aqp1$2@dont-email.me> <vmt8re$1jmo3$2@dont-email.me> <vmu0lv$1o8bt$1@dont-email.me> <vmu5rj$1p7vp$2@dont-email.me> <3ln5pjd4ig2g7lm79p3o4ep02nchcjs4cj@4ax.com> <vmur5j$1t7qv$2@dont-email.me> <vmursr$1t8ma$2@dont-email.me> <lhi6pj1suinb5i342fvksrgoklbr8jbu2v@4ax.com> <4vk6pj95hpr902a7uquvm8e3ra3s4lf7r7@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:14:11 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="88dcce01f89d9459fe4cfbefa07f7ebb"; logging-data="2254377"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XfGJQ6NIZLcIct8sP1geI" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:hMC3mWx/zLrhma9etCW4Ky38KUA= In-Reply-To: <4vk6pj95hpr902a7uquvm8e3ra3s4lf7r7@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4821 Am 24.01.2025 um 09:57 schrieb John B.: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 03:19:49 -0500, Catrike Ryder > <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:54:37 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >> >>> On 1/23/2025 7:42 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>> On 1/23/2025 7:33 PM, John B. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> And who pays the road tax if you call the police? Or the >>>>> water works, >>>>> or the fire department, all of which need to use the roads >>>>> to aid you >>>>> the caller? >>>> >>>> I'm not saying non-drivers should pay zero for the roads. >>>> But they do pay, as Andrew said, in property taxes, sales >>>> taxes, and even the price of goods, since companies build >>>> transport costs into that price. >>>> >>>> I'm simply saying more of the burden should be on those who >>>> make more use of the roads. >>>> >>>> I think railroads are a close parallel to highways. Andrew >>>> says, in essence, we should all pay for roads because we all >>>> use goods delivered by roads. I can agree with that concept. >>>> But it also applies to railroads. We all use commodities >>>> delivered by rail. >>>> >>>> Our difference is that the car fans here want no further >>>> expenses on those who use cars on those same roads. In >>>> practice, they want to drive with no fares, to have their >>>> driving subsidized. But they don't want to subsidize train >>>> fares, even though that's a perfectly parallel situation. >>>> And they don't want to pay congestion charges in super- >>>> crowded cities. They just want the city residents to deal >>>> with their presence, their contribution to congestion, >>>> pollution, etc. >>>> >>> >>> Some important differences there. >>> Governments do not own or maintain track (outside of local >>> urban systems such as MTA or CTA or BART). >>> >>> The only intercity passenger rail is Amtrak, which is an >>> entertainment/display system, not a functional >>> transportation system. It's not anywhere near competitive on >>> travel times, reliability or price. And Amtrak does not own >>> or maintain railbed AFAIK. >> >> There's also big differences in how highways and railroads share >> freight travel and passnger travel facilities. Are rail passengers >> going to be Ok with freight train speeds and the switching delays? I >> suspect lots of special facilities would be required for high speed >> passenger trains whereas cars and trucks get along with each other >> just fine on highways. > > History shows that a long time ago people did ride trains, in large > numbers and now they don't. So the first question is "why". In my > little home town people used to take the train to Boston do some > shopping and then train back on Sunday night. About 200 miles one way. History shows that the demise of the railroad is not god-given. In the 1950's, the popularity of car driving make trains unpopular in all western countries. From the 1990's onwards, trains started to become a lot more attractive in Europe, with passenger numbers by now significantly higher than before WW 2. In the past, there were often 4 or 5 trains per day, now we know a train service can only be sucessful with at least one train per hour, better one train every 30 minutes.