Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vn1ft6$2gali$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Opus <ifonly@youknew.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 on MSVC
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:48:22 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vn1ft6$2gali$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vmohjl$79d9$1@dont-email.me> <vmp33n$cqs5$2@dont-email.me>
 <vmup1q$1stl0$1@dont-email.me> <vmvdn6$243si$3@dont-email.me>
 <20250124140605.00004d20@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:48:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="001ba7cafecfb0792d9a85e2fa5245ad";
	logging-data="2632370"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bTT/Y4vAaRYA4AWzmbY4F"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LjWEyc0eLJBGCg5vW9QbOCOcA+8=
In-Reply-To: <20250124140605.00004d20@yahoo.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2317

On 24/01/2025 13:06, Michael S wrote:
> May be, because majority of additions to the Standard were codifying
> existing gcc practice?
> BTW, there is nothing wrong with that. In the situation where gcc team
> is the only capable team interested in further development of C
> language, it is the most logical outcome.

Yes, the main reason is that GCC actually cares about C.
MS hasn't for over 2 decades.
They just mostly stuck to C89 for their own needs (kernel, drivers...) 
with just a few proprietary MS extensions. They never cared beyond that 
and switched to C++ entirely mid-90's for all their developments (apart 
again from the very low level) even when the Windows API itself was 
still C for the most part.

> I suppose, MSVC team would appreciate addition of
> __try/__except/__finally.
> But since it didn't happen in last 31 years, it is not very likely to
> happen in the future.

Considering they are using C only for the low-level parts, shouldn't 
they embrace Rust instead, which they are promoters of? Or are they 
"promoting" it for everyone else except themselves? Not really willing 
to start a flamewar (although it can be fun with some topics), but just 
curious.