Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C90 fpeek
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:55:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <vn3tmd$35e2n$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vmv082$1u6pm$1@dont-email.me>
	<87plkc6bgm.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <a7NkP.76379$ZEZf.241@fx40.iad>
	<20250124114602.417@kylheku.com> <fbUkP.928259$2xE6.372374@fx18.iad>
	<vn19ff$2fd1i$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 00:55:58 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="242dfd8966dadc131984b5b1dada7143";
	logging-data="3323991"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BOKgEFMLtkeGrVkzFz0GK"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ph/yl+2jxeS6/oaenMHMgLAoE1Q=
Bytes: 1470

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 10:58:32 +1100, Paul Edwards wrote:

> You could argue that if I'm willing to add ANSI X3.64,
> why not also add C23 and POSIX and ...
> 
> I don't have a good answer to that, other than I'm trying to keep
> movement away from C90 to a minimum.

Let me suggest a more reasonable baseline for code that is to be minimally 
relevant to this century: C99 + POSIX.