| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vn4sfi$3ijdb$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:41:22 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <vn4sfi$3ijdb$2@dont-email.me> References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <ee4e189d-56bc-4ed7-b7b7-cd71fc4d2349@att.net> <vmqh9k$urua$1@dont-email.me> <903de8e1-3538-4cfe-9f7a-6509eda47ab6@att.net> <vmsvfv$1hn5k$1@dont-email.me> <3844edd7-0750-4418-bff6-2759817446b3@att.net> <vmvn1h$25r19$1@dont-email.me> <27377646-137a-4f8f-a7bb-a75707b2da96@att.net> <vn2gcf$2ouuo$2@dont-email.me> <965ee9868f28953d437113d0d38f069815499a3f@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:41:23 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f29b607f7791c09fbf29348f2e168486"; logging-data="3755435"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4WZopFpgwaN1jB+nMgbcNafmyZQycSE8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:es6q82iCREru6vQzz2Gudo3Z6u0= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <965ee9868f28953d437113d0d38f069815499a3f@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2050 On 25.01.2025 14:56, joes wrote: > There is obviously no single FISON that is equal to N. Obviously every union of FISONs is finite, because there are never two consecutive actually infinite sets in ℕ, and every FISON has an infinite set as successors. Obviously every unbion of FISONs is a FISON. > >> Do you agree that or every FISON the question whether it is necessary >> can be answered? > Yes, in the negative. That does not imply the nonexistence of a > sufficient set. It implies that there is not a first FISON. That proves by induction that every FISON can be dropped. Your belief is dysfunctional logic. Regards, WM