Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vn6ico$8je0$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: ksh - issue with (non-existing) jobs
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:01:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vn6ico$8je0$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vn2v1c$2s2ce$1@dont-email.me> <vn3u8a$35e2n$8@dont-email.me>
	<vn3vdk$3686j$1@dont-email.me> <vn45ut$37klv$6@dont-email.me>
	<vn58ti$3o8mi$1@dont-email.me> <vn6b63$50b2$11@dont-email.me>
	<vn6c6s$6c7q$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:01:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0dd28ea0fd408046f13ac9cefad553c";
	logging-data="282048"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AdI8CIxpvxuwJMxYaa1l1"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Bn/H2A+WiO7lf/IhebOPGmorVUA=
Bytes: 1571

On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 23:15:55 +0100, Janis Papanagnou wrote:

> On 26.01.2025 22:58, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> The “wait” command doesn’t require you to specify which job to wait
>> for.
> 
> Yes, so what? - Mind that there's no process/job running any more.

Given it is capable of waiting in general for any job to terminate, it 
might take a different path through the code that is not afflicted by the 
same state confusion.