| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vn6rbl$bhvk$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women! Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:34:29 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <vn6rbl$bhvk$1@dont-email.me> References: <vn4irf$3fstj$1@dont-email.me> <vn60ed$1fm3$1@dont-email.me> <vn6et0$78ob$1@dont-email.me> <vn6g56$7tpe$1@dont-email.me> <vn6hug$8j77$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 03:34:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12842fc68f50afc53f02edb1477ac56f"; logging-data="378868"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199kDwmceIMvsqGJqw8TnOu" User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Cancel-Lock: sha1:130elKYLHg2rloT3/f9wAT06F7Q= Bytes: 2359 On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI >>>> >>>> Love Riley. She speaks facts. >>> >>> What law forces a declaration of gender at birth? >> >> I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law stopping >> grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing themselves in >> women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from taking >> trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be >> women. >> >> This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth. > > Maybe I misunderstood. I thought the issue came down to who's male and > who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other. If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.