Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vn6rbl$bhvk$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:34:29 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vn6rbl$bhvk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vn4irf$3fstj$1@dont-email.me> <vn60ed$1fm3$1@dont-email.me> <vn6et0$78ob$1@dont-email.me> <vn6g56$7tpe$1@dont-email.me> <vn6hug$8j77$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 03:34:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12842fc68f50afc53f02edb1477ac56f";
	logging-data="378868"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199kDwmceIMvsqGJqw8TnOu"
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:130elKYLHg2rloT3/f9wAT06F7Q=
Bytes: 2359

On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>    On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>>    Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI
>>>>    
>>>>    Love Riley. She speaks facts.
>>> 
>>>  What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?
>>  
>>  I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law stopping
>>  grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing themselves in
>>  women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from taking
>>  trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be
>>  women.
>>  
>>  This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought the issue came down to who's male and 
> who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.

If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the
women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.