Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vn7mna$ogih$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Subject: Re: book report
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:21:30 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vn7mna$ogih$1@dont-email.me>
References: <72c1204c-651f-4f8f-8b36-7aaf8ac261fd@gmail.com>
 <LemdnTwWfaQh0Bf6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <ef924ec6-a593-45e8-9278-60a9da0b137a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:21:31 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="60996df0a4b13b78929c1aa3fbe2ecaa";
	logging-data="803409"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VCKOltOTq5T2IezFVwvurjim2wGdxpyY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:H4Abvjm2/AXM0BMqVtC4wpwx51k=
In-Reply-To: <ef924ec6-a593-45e8-9278-60a9da0b137a@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2639

On 1/17/25 08:34, erik simpson wrote:
> On 1/17/25 4:31 AM, John Harshman wrote:
>> On 1/14/25 5:13 PM, erik simpson wrote:
>>> I've just finished reading "Macroevolutionaries" by Lieberman and 
>>> Eldredge.  I recommend it highly.  It's a history extending from the 
>>> beginning of the 19th century to the present of the evolution (no 
>>> pun) of the gradual development of our understanding of evolution 
>>> itself. One of the punctuations (pun intended this time) is the 
>>> brilliance of SJ Gould.
>>>
>>> Some of the more funny chapters involves the evolution of trumpets, 
>>> replete with a mass extinction of valveless trumpets around 1820, 
>>> rapid diversification and eventual slower evolution to the present 
>>> day. Clades can be identified. It seems that biology isn't the only 
>>> thing that "only makes sense as evolution".
>>
>> How do slide trombones fit into the phylogeny? And are horns featured? 
>> Presumably they developed valves at around the same time.
> Trombones were only morphologically different.  Horns were like 
> trumpets, but differed in having three different types of valves so 
> there were even more clades than trumpets.

So.  Double checking.

The music of the spheres is minor mode, right?

This is because 1.5 times the frequency of c is f
sharp or g flat, and is neither f nor g?

(An 'octave' actually has seven notes and not
eight, but is actually 7 + 5 (twelve tones).)

Correct?