| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vn7mna$ogih$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: x <x@x.org> Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology Subject: Re: book report Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:21:30 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <vn7mna$ogih$1@dont-email.me> References: <72c1204c-651f-4f8f-8b36-7aaf8ac261fd@gmail.com> <LemdnTwWfaQh0Bf6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ef924ec6-a593-45e8-9278-60a9da0b137a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:21:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="60996df0a4b13b78929c1aa3fbe2ecaa"; logging-data="803409"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VCKOltOTq5T2IezFVwvurjim2wGdxpyY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:H4Abvjm2/AXM0BMqVtC4wpwx51k= In-Reply-To: <ef924ec6-a593-45e8-9278-60a9da0b137a@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2639 On 1/17/25 08:34, erik simpson wrote: > On 1/17/25 4:31 AM, John Harshman wrote: >> On 1/14/25 5:13 PM, erik simpson wrote: >>> I've just finished reading "Macroevolutionaries" by Lieberman and >>> Eldredge. I recommend it highly. It's a history extending from the >>> beginning of the 19th century to the present of the evolution (no >>> pun) of the gradual development of our understanding of evolution >>> itself. One of the punctuations (pun intended this time) is the >>> brilliance of SJ Gould. >>> >>> Some of the more funny chapters involves the evolution of trumpets, >>> replete with a mass extinction of valveless trumpets around 1820, >>> rapid diversification and eventual slower evolution to the present >>> day. Clades can be identified. It seems that biology isn't the only >>> thing that "only makes sense as evolution". >> >> How do slide trombones fit into the phylogeny? And are horns featured? >> Presumably they developed valves at around the same time. > Trombones were only morphologically different. Horns were like > trumpets, but differed in having three different types of valves so > there were even more clades than trumpets. So. Double checking. The music of the spheres is minor mode, right? This is because 1.5 times the frequency of c is f sharp or g flat, and is neither f nor g? (An 'octave' actually has seven notes and not eight, but is actually 7 + 5 (twelve tones).) Correct?