Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vna1jo$1lue7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Civil asset forfeiture reigned in! Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 07:39:36 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <vna1jo$1lue7$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:39:36 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="233942b5da0881e8c982f406274bfda2"; logging-data="1767879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2xQQxX4c/plCDAbWpS4FufGaGPCsd+sg=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:3QfGxp4Cy7ywQv11rccES9AdiII= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 1417 Nevada court rules policr mst follow state law, not federal asset forfeiture agreements, when seizing cash without probable cause. A veteran was passing through Nevada to visit his daughter. Cops see he has cash, which turns out to be his life's savings. They do not write traffic ticket for bogus reason they made traffic stop. They give the monies to DEA which returns 80% to the police. Police claim they've found a loophole and do not have to obey state law but court rules against them. Institute for Justice case, Steve Lehto video. January 12, 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq_TG-cQmQg