Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-01-22 (Wednesday)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 04:30:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vnahbj$1qq60$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vmtsli$1n1t0$1@dont-email.me> <UBI20250122@dont-email.me!> <vmuloo$1s921$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 13:08:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b860a097c1f6d41dc8aa03f500dd56aa";
	logging-data="1927360"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19c/VjdJs2GY/8pWf8NKfkmvoPqzAmwm3w="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xkhvzl7Iw6TOw6cnsLMH1XWTScU=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 1917


In article <vmuloo$1s921$1@dont-email.me>, ijball@mac.invalid wrote:
> On 1/23/25 1:42 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

>> Pop Culture Breakdown | Captain America 4 Ticket Sales BAD | Skydance Wants NuTrek CANCELED!:
>> POP CULTURE BREAKDOWN returns as we discuss recent rumors that auditors 
>> for Skydance have recommended canceling Kurtzman Trek and resetting the 
>> franchise to Star Trek: Enterprise, 
>
>Well, it's not the best answer (if they mean the ST:E (2001-2005) TV 
>series, and not "Star Trek: Enterprise" generally).
>
>But it feels like they lack imagination if they mean the latter - there 
>are a lot of ships from the era of ST:TOS, several of which ended up 
>getting toasted, which would probably be worth basing a TV series, or 
>limited series, around. Not every show needs to be set on the Enterprise!
>
>Also, I thought the general perception was that "Star Trek: Strange New 
>Worlds" wasn't bad...

I only saw a couple eps and liked it. 

--
Not a joke! Don't jump!