Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vnca5t$27rem$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Trump's Freezing of Federal Grants Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:18:05 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 90 Message-ID: <vnca5t$27rem$1@dont-email.me> References: <vnc1fj$22hei$3@dont-email.me> <vnc2lf$1qpbf$2@dont-email.me> <vnc4o4$23cv3$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 05:18:06 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="450e95dc0d79fdf510996d13d7b2cfa2"; logging-data="2354646"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YOhag3NSHZMCzQfu7e1tZt6gHBny5uSI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NEatL/ea6kimH/Kn6TnEBus5nXs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vnc4o4$23cv3$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4761 On 1/28/2025 9:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jan 28, 2025 at 6:09:51 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> > wrote: > >> On 2025-01-28 8:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> Trump issued a temporary freeze on federal grant payments today. This is a >>> necessary move, as many of these of these grants are used to fund ridiculous >>> left-wing projects – many not even in America! >>> >>> Let's take a look at some of them. >>> >>> >>> In 2021, the Biden administration gave $540,000 to Transgender Equity >>> Consulting, Inc. This firm is comprised of "six black and latinks >>> transgender >>> and nonbinary individuals" – one whom is apparently the "first BBW trans >>> porn >>> star". >>> >>> Alright then. Certainly sounds like something my federal tax dollars should >>> be >>> funding. >>> >>> >>> The Biden admin issued $850,000 in federal grants to a left-wing >>> organization's "LGBTQI+ family support program," to provide training for >>> military families on how to "affirm the gender identity of their children". >>> >>> >>> Over half a million went to support "behavioral health for the transgender >>> community in Hawaii". >>> >>> Thanks, Biden. >>> >>> >>> Biden sent $1.2 million to the New Orleans Community Support Foundation to >>> "adopt a holistic, adaptive water management vision that centers the >>> leadership of black, indigenous, and people of color communities." >>> >>> Water management benefits from having non-white people in charge. Who knew? >>> Of >>> course we saw how well DEI and water management mixed in L.A., didn't we? >>> >>> >>> More than $600,000 to UC Irvine to "influence" social media networks to try >>> to >>> get black and latinks people to accept Wuhan Flu vaccines. >>> >>> >>> $728,747 went to Florida International University to help understand the >>> experiences of black students learning mathematics in a "hispanic-serving >>> institution context". >>> >>> Uh...okay. >>> >>> >>> Half a million for natural resource management...in Honduras. >>> >>> >>> However, all of the above combined amounts to just a drop in the bucket when >>> compared to how much money is going to pro-illegal immigration stuff. >>> >>> Example: Over $278 MILLION to Catholic Charities of Fort Worth for "refugee >>> cash and medical assistance". >>> >>> Yep, that's right. Our tax money going to provide free health care and cash >>> handouts to illegals. You still have to pay for your health care, don't you, >>> you stupid American citizen. But illegals just have to crawl across the >>> border >>> and the federal government will give it to them for free... with your money. >>> >>> >> I have no doubt that many of these grants are not a good use of public >> money; the beneficiaries should probably be left to their own devices - >> i.e. fundraising - to fund their activities. >> >> I have to wonder how many of these grants go to good and worthy causes >> that taxpayers would approve. Surely there must be SOME! >> >> Is turning off the grant tap entirely really the best way to proceed? >> Maybe grants need to be assessed individually and only cut off if they >> fail to meet whatever criteria the government sets for being worthy of >> grants. > > That's what they're doing. They've put a stop to it until they can decide > which ones are legitimate and which ones are ridiculous wastes of money. I wonder if "legitimate" and "ridiculous waste" falls along party lines.