Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:33:42 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <vnfh1m$2s8gn$10@dont-email.me>
References: <_hycnQxlN5kAphr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <BIecndu1efInAwj6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lvlop6Fsla4U1@mid.individual.net>
 <1Wadnbe7od-Cagj6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lvnmrsF805rU1@mid.individual.net>
 <ya6cnQDRWsUtWAv6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lvo349F9nquU1@mid.individual.net>
 <8RucnQnhsYgzjgr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lvolbmFcivvU1@mid.individual.net>
 <9ducnXj9pdrfuwr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lvq33sFjf80U1@mid.individual.net> <vnbem8$1vqpp$1@dont-email.me>
 <L-OcnbDpO-S-1wT6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <b63f90c0-28ea-2f05-1a65-ab975ae6b112@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:33:42 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="badafcb688ceae3163f4072549b31f8e";
	logging-data="3023383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eMZHLC3H14VZdcarRG9tsVUh4htInGgE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sTKBKsH81QRVw4ateZA/V0h4Elc=
In-Reply-To: <b63f90c0-28ea-2f05-1a65-ab975ae6b112@example.net>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 29/01/2025 14:12, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> 
>> On 1/28/25 3:28 PM, Rich wrote:
>>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed
>>>>>     was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on 
>>>>> the air
>>>>>     SINCE the 60s.
>>>>
>>>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of
>>>> anything.
>>>
>>> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of:
>>>
>>> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any
>>>     music;
>>>
>>> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us
>>>     cares one iota about.
>>
>>  That's kind of the case of US commercial radio
>>  these days. Of course it was kind of like that
>>  for a long time music/ads/music/ads timed I think
>>  by the length of a 45 record. FM radio used to
>>  run longer stuff, but that's RARE now.
>>
>>  However I did hit on an FM station that ran the
>>  entire "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" not too long ago.
>>  The DJ must have had the runs or something and
>>  needed to spend 17 minutes on the can  :-)
> 
> What about AM? Maybe that's where the good stuff lives?

AM is of such crap quality it is unlistenable. 30-3kHz bandwidth and 
40dB signal to noise? You have top be freakin' kidding me!
FM is way better,
Digital radio is even better than that..

But all sorts of good stuff exists on the 'net.

-- 
“Some people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of 
a car with the cramped public exposure of 
an airplane.”

Dennis Miller