Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
Followup-To: alt.test
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 4:35:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <vng5ms$30do9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vn4irf$3fstj$1@dont-email.me> <vn704s$cj14$1@dont-email.me>
 <vn743p$i53s$1@dont-email.me> <vn8blk$11j61$1@dont-email.me>
 <vn8n2r$163m1$2@dont-email.me> <fgjhpjpu53omf39l71fv457p2tii4knqri@4ax.com> <vnb54a$1ubhl$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 16:26:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ce6d21733045a76d85bdef6de4de240";
	logging-data="3159817"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XcYWTb2FPdTAejOkUo2XzHkS7O+3pDLo="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:t+n0JeXvK1HWsNlOpaSQfALgdjo=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 3511

moviepig wrote:
> On 1/28/2025 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 27, 2025 at 8:18:59 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>> Love Riley. She speaks facts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law
>>>>>>>>> stopping grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing
>>>>>>>>> themselves in women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping
>>>>>>>>> men from taking trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by 
>>>>>>>>> pretending to be women.
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>> This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought the issue came down to who's male and
>>>>>>>> who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the
>>>>>>> women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure it *is* all that certain.
>>>>>   
>>>>> Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people continually
>>>>> eludes you.
>>>>>   
>>>>>>  E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in *anyone's* face is problematic.  Regardless, 
>>>>>>  I think the particular social mores you want enforced would need you to define, 
>>>>>>  in unambiguous legalese, who's male and who's female.  Imo, that won't be trivial.
>>>>
>>>> Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"?
>>>
>>> The man had his penis exposed in a women's locker room.
>> 
>> Goodness how WILL we tell the difference?
>> Laughter.
>
>The difference between what?

Feigned ignorance noted.

[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]

--
Don't jump!