Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vngd1k$31mc1$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 17:31:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <vngd1k$31mc1$2@dont-email.me>
References: <_hycnQxlN5kAphr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>   <ya6cnQDRWsUtWAv6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lvo349F9nquU1@mid.individual.net> <8RucnQnhsYgzjgr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lvolbmFcivvU1@mid.individual.net> <9ducnXj9pdrfuwr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lvq33sFjf80U1@mid.individual.net> <vnbem8$1vqpp$1@dont-email.me> <L-OcnbDpO-S-1wT6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <b63f90c0-28ea-2f05-1a65-ab975ae6b112@example.net> <vnfh1m$2s8gn$10@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:31:32 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5a392c797157f57498841fa2a18622cf";
	logging-data="3201409"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AlhsS37ZRT7rCh4BRZlD8"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uSvsk+4DlJnLeFvXPZfDToFiIZw=
Bytes: 3283

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 29/01/2025 14:12, D wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1/28/25 3:28 PM, Rich wrote:
>>>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>    Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed
>>>>>>     was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on 
>>>>>> the air
>>>>>>     SINCE the 60s.
>>>>>
>>>>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of
>>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of:
>>>>
>>>> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any
>>>>     music;
>>>>
>>>> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us
>>>>     cares one iota about.
>>>
>>>  That's kind of the case of US commercial radio
>>>  these days. Of course it was kind of like that
>>>  for a long time music/ads/music/ads timed I think
>>>  by the length of a 45 record. FM radio used to
>>>  run longer stuff, but that's RARE now.
>>>
>>>  However I did hit on an FM station that ran the
>>>  entire "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" not too long ago.
>>>  The DJ must have had the runs or something and
>>>  needed to spend 17 minutes on the can  :-)
>> 
>> What about AM? Maybe that's where the good stuff lives?
> 
> AM is of such crap quality it is unlistenable. 30-3kHz bandwidth and 
> 40dB signal to noise? You have top be freakin' kidding me!
> FM is way better,
> Digital radio is even better than that..
> 
> But all sorts of good stuff exists on the 'net.

There's a reason why US AM broadcast is almost entirely "talk radio" 
now.  The 3khz bandwidth and 40db s/n is /ok/ for 'talk'.  But for 
music, yes, it is utter crap.