Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:33:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <vngd5d$31vem$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vn4irf$3fstj$1@dont-email.me> <vn704s$cj14$1@dont-email.me>
 <vn743p$i53s$1@dont-email.me> <vn8blk$11j61$1@dont-email.me>
 <vn8n2r$163m1$2@dont-email.me> <fgjhpjpu53omf39l71fv457p2tii4knqri@4ax.com>
 <vnb54a$1ubhl$2@dont-email.me> <utqmpj1vkacrpoar8iko05prcfijm2of1r@4ax.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:33:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e1671ab781e3cad73710cd5f0af0f0e5";
	logging-data="3210710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SrXxhZmWS7FaXOkP65p4IVsEidxMHD6c="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:e7GJTW8LPGcthhomOXbdZLnP3Fg=
In-Reply-To: <utqmpj1vkacrpoar8iko05prcfijm2of1r@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4447

On 1/30/2025 7:08 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:45:45 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/28/2025 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:33:47 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2025 at 8:18:59 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>    On Jan 26, 2025 at 7:56:12 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>    On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>      On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>      On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>        On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>        On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>          On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>        wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI
>>>>>>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>>>>>>          Love Riley. She speaks facts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>        What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?
>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>        I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law
>>>>>>>>>> stopping
>>>>>>>>>>        grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing
>>>>>>>>>>    themselves in
>>>>>>>>>>        women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from
>>>>>>>>>> taking
>>>>>>>>>>        trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be
>>>>>>>>>>        women.
>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>        This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought the issue came down to who's male and
>>>>>>>>>      who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.
>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>      If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the
>>>>>>>>      women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    I'm not sure it *is* all that certain.
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>    Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people continually
>>>>>>    eludes you.
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>       E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in
>>>>>>>    *anyone's* face is problematic.  Regardless, I think the particular
>>>>>>>    social mores you want enforced would need you to define, in unambiguous
>>>>>>>    legalese, who's male and who's female.  Imo, that won't be trivial.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"?
>>>>
>>>> The man had his penis exposed in a women's locker room.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Goodness how WILL we tell the difference?
>>> Laughter.
>>
>> The difference between what?
>>
> 
> The difference between women and men pretending to be women.

Didn't know that was a puzzle, but okay...