| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vnhcr2$377al$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: WAR AND PEACE by Tolstoy Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:34:09 +1300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 117 Message-ID: <vnhcr2$377al$1@dont-email.me> References: <20250130a@crcomp.net> Reply-To: noone@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 03:34:11 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f304dfc1692733ddf1622c0d85af01d2"; logging-data="3382613"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DvWGUMsoAGjXDo2AnHWM5" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:X1uSQFn/ER8Zop2UvQH1v9ADPDg= In-Reply-To: <20250130a@crcomp.net> Content-Language: en-AU On 31/01/25 10:55, Don wrote: > It's not really Science Fiction, but it's been mentioned lately. > > The parts pertaining to peaceful romance appeal to me much more than > the warfare. Ironically, Tolstoy's tome helps me cope with armed > conflict. > Tolstoy's the tonic to sort out the scat show called war. His Rus > realist savoir-faire offers welcome relief from the relentlessly riven > mass mind's culture of chaotic current events: > > A Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing > and does not want to know anything, since he does not > believe that anything can be known. > > As an aside, did the Tiffany Network plagiarize Tolstoy in its > previously popular prisoner of war TV show? > An interesting Tolstoy translation tic: the absent antecedent, > also missing elsewhere, when Russian is translated into English. For > instance, the antecedent's apparently an apparition when the pronoun > "ours" appears in this translated excerpt: > > "We must let him see Amelie, she's exquisite!" said > one of "ours," kissing his finger tips. > > Tolstoy masterfully shares his characters' inner life. This technique > reveals characters as all too human; enthralled to human virtue and > vice. > The reader receives omniscience; a granular view of humanity's > triumphs and travails, without a protagonist to lead the reader around > by the nose. > When Russian soldier Andrey Grigoriev killed Ukrainian soldier > Dmytro Maslovsky in hand-to-hand combat, the latter reportedly said: > "Let me say goodbye to the sky." A similar situation occurs in WAR AND > PEACE: > > "What's this? Am I falling? My legs are giving way," thought > he, and fell on his back. He opened his eyes, hoping to see > how the struggle of the Frenchmen with the gunners ended, > whether the red-haired gunner had been killed or not and > whether the cannon had been captured or saved. But he saw > nothing. Above him there was now nothing but the sky-the > lofty sky, not clear yet still immeasurably lofty, with gray > clouds gliding slowly across it. "How quiet, peaceful, and > solemn; not at all as I ran," thought Prince Andrew-"not as > we ran, shouting and fighting, not at all as the gunner and > the Frenchman with frightened and angry faces struggled for > the mop: how differently do those clouds glide across that > lofty infinite sky! How was it I did not see that lofty sky > before? And how happy I am to have found it at last! Yes! > All is vanity, all falsehood, except that infinite sky. > There is nothing, nothing, but that. But even it does not > exist, there is nothing but quiet and peace. Thank God!..." > > Some see events as tightly controlled by powerful Great Men: Cameron, > May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer, Obama, Trump, Biden, Putin, and > Zelensky. Tolstoy views Great Men as powerless: > > The actions of Napoleon and Alexander, on whose words the > event seemed to hang, were as little voluntary as the > actions of any soldier who was drawn into the campaign by > lot or by conscription. This could not be otherwise, for in > order that the will of Napoleon and Alexander (on whom the > event seemed to depend) should be carried out, the > concurrence of innumerable circumstances was needed without > any one of which the event could not have taken place. It was > necessary that millions of men in whose hands lay the real > power-the soldiers who fired, or transported provisions and > guns-should consent to carry out the will of these weak > individuals, and should have been induced to do so by an > infinite number of diverse and complex causes. ... > > In historic events the so-called great men are labels giving > names to events, and like labels they have but the smallest > connection with the event itself. > > Every act of theirs, which appears to them an act of their > own will, is in an historical sense involuntary and is > related to the whole course of history and predestined > from eternity. ... > > The luring of Napoleon into the depths of the country was > not the result of any plan, for no one believed it to be > possible; it resulted from a most complex interplay of > intrigues, aims, and wishes among those who took part in > the war and had no perception whatever of the inevitable, > or of the one way of saving Russia. Everything came about > fortuitously. > > A few football fans fantasize about war being merely another football > game. Tolstoy thinks the consequences are greater: > > An army gains a victory, and at once the rights of the > conquering nation have increased to the detriment of the > defeated. An army has suffered defeat, and at once a people > loses its rights in proportion to the severity of the reverse, > and if its army suffers a complete defeat the nation is quite > subjugated. > > Witness how enlightened Globalism spontaneously sparked a woke wake > pyre. > The Russian Orthodox Church (a close cousin to the Catholic Church) > plays a prominent enough role in the novel for Napoleon to remark, "That > Asiatic city of the innumerable churches, holy Moscow!" > The Mandylion flag, emblazened with IC XC NIKA, is reportedly the > most popular battle flag in the militias of the Donetsk and Luhansk > People's Republics. In the end, only God Almighty determines the outcome > of war. > For people who love long stories - WAR AND PEACE is a very long > story. Tolstoy made a realist out of me and his novel is recommended. > Thank you for those fascinatingly interesting observations and recommendation. (It is four or five years since I obtained a copy but the length has usually influenced shorter novels to be chosen to read first as I do not like to be reading more than one book at a time.)