Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vnjaif$3lioc$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Karen Bass Tweets That Did Not Age Well Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:07:41 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vnjaif$3lioc$1@dont-email.me> References: <vn8raa$16pd6$3@dont-email.me> <vnc9ng$27rel$1@dont-email.me> <el1qpj1jemut0retlp4mulqrjemtfaakml@4ax.com> <vnj29u$3jobu$4@dont-email.me> <vnj3c4$3k34n$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:07:44 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="559df8519c024555ab02b0f4d035fcee"; logging-data="3853068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180/iOLB/odQcQKmDg9YsEnE/nZcHHJi5U=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ksG7OmCefvTpLGvpYVr+ZH/Bz/I= In-Reply-To: <vnj3c4$3k34n$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2453 On 1/31/2025 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jan 31, 2025 at 9:46:36 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >> On 1/31/2025 12:22 PM, The Horny Goat wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:10:24 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/28/2025 10:23 PM, The Horny Goat wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:38:45 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> So what is she being criticized for? >>>>>> >>>>>> She's being criticized by Republicans because she's a Democrat. Her >>>>>> apparent incompetence just makes for better political theater. >>>>> >>>>> In fairness Republicans WILL criticize Democrats and there are enough >>>>> of each that there are BOUND to be a few on far left of the bell curve >>>>> for competence (between totally incompetent and being a >>>>> miracle-worker) >>>>> >>>>> The good ones don't get the flak. >>>> >>>> Nowadays, the opposing party will ALWAYS attack the most vulnerable, >>>> even were there only archangels to choose among. >>>> >>> An exaggeration but not by much... >> >> Every archangel has a Lucifer in him. > > According to the Christian theology, that's literally not true. Why not? Can there be only one?