Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vnjc8d$3lioc$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: OT: "Free speech" becomes a verb & noun... Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:36:27 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: <vnjc8d$3lioc$2@dont-email.me> References: <vnevm0$2q5um$1@dont-email.me> <vngva4$352uk$2@dont-email.me> <vnh3gn$362a7$2@dont-email.me> <756b5fd0-51d2-4df0-89cb-d9b2c7ddbda3@nowhere.com> <vnj3a2$3k34n$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:36:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="559df8519c024555ab02b0f4d035fcee"; logging-data="3853068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/IHQfwqqdtVuyMq8DzDDTl+zGJiMGfORQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:R5MMRwTzf1L4Hdpqq60c5LL6HGs= In-Reply-To: <vnj3a2$3k34n$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 6451 On 1/31/2025 1:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jan 31, 2025 at 9:37:23 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >> On 1/30/2025 6:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Jan 30, 2025 at 2:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/30/2025 4:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Jan 30, 2025 at 12:13:03 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/30/2025 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2025 at 9:47:35 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/29/2025 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2025 at 8:37:20 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Trump administration to cancel student visas of pro-Palestinian >>>>>>>>>> protesters" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-cancel-student-visas-all-hamas-sympathizers-white-house-2025-01-29/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's a deportable offense under the U.S. Code for a resident alien to >>>>>>>>> advocate for or express support for a terrorist organization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So then, I'm guessing this administration would've championed >>>>>>>> deportations from Skokie in '77. What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Was there a designated terrorist organization involved in Skokie, and were >>>>>>> the participants resident aliens or American citizens? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is "pro-Palestine" a terrorist organization? >>>>> >>>>> Nice try. Waving the actual flag of Hamas is not simply 'pro-Palestine'. >>>>> Neither is chanting the official Hamas motto from its own charter: >>>>> "From the >>>>> river to the sea." >>>>> >>>>>> Is pro-Nazi not? >>>>> >>>>> The American Nazi Party was not a designated terrorist organization and >>>>> even >>>>> if it was, all those marching were American citizens, not resident aliens. >>>> >>>> "A designated terrorist organization" sounds a lot like "It's different >>>> when WE do it". >>> >>> Regardless, if a group hasn't been listed as a designated terrorist group by >>> the Department of State, then the statute does not apply. Back in the 70s, >>> when the Skokie march occurred, the American Nazi Party was not a designated >>> terrorist organization, nor were the participants foreign nationals. >>> >>>> Trump is punishing these students for their speech >>> >>> No, he's enforcing American immigration law, something that you apparently >>> can't stand, and which Biden failed to do for four straight years. No, >>> that's >>> wrong. Biden didn't fail to do it. That implies a lack of intent. He refused >>> to do it. >>> >>>> once again leveraging populist spleen to flout bedrock American principles. >>> >>> It's not an American principle to allow agents of violent foreign jihadists >>> that hate America to come to this country and radicalize our own population >>> to >>> their cause. That is in no way, shape, or form something the 1st Amendment >>> was >>> intended to protect. >>> >>>> I can't fathom any free-speech advocate's support of this. >>> >>> Well, I can't fathom your constant opposition to most of what the 1st >>> Amendment *does* protect, so we'll call it a wash. >> >> Call it a whitewash, because it is. These students are being punished >> for voicing support of Palestine > > If they're hoisting the flag of Hamas and chanting "from the river to the > sea", then they're doing a lot more than voicing support for Palestine. > American citizens are allowed to do that but if you're a guest in our country > you better be on your best behavior and not go all in for a terrorist > organization that advocates for the destruction of America. > > We don't need you here. You have no right to be here. So endorsing a group > whose stated goal is the destruction of our country (along with Israel) while > here as our guest has consequences. Fuck around and find out. > >> Suffice to suppose that, if this deportation initiative were Democratic, >> you'd be apoplectic. > > I'd be apoplectic because I'd be shocked to my core that the current crop of > Democrats were actually deporting anyone for anything. > > My idiotic mayor, fresh off her spectacularly appalling performance during the > wildfires, was on TV yesterday reassuring "the immigrant community" that the > city of Los Angeles will protect you from ICE no matter what crimes you've > committed. She's literally on TV telling rapists, murderers, thieves, and > narco-traffickers that she has their back. > > Never mind that "the immigrant community" she's so worried about has no desire > to have those violent shitbags turned loose on their streets any more than > anyone else does. I get that you're pleased with the practical result of Trump's vendetta, just as (I assume) you're pleased that we've let Trump skate on attempted election corruption. I just can't see how you're comfortable with the cost to our basic principles (...with more likely to follow).