Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vnjc8d$3lioc$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: OT: "Free speech" becomes a verb & noun...
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:36:27 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 111
Message-ID: <vnjc8d$3lioc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vnevm0$2q5um$1@dont-email.me> <vngva4$352uk$2@dont-email.me>
 <vnh3gn$362a7$2@dont-email.me>
 <756b5fd0-51d2-4df0-89cb-d9b2c7ddbda3@nowhere.com>
 <vnj3a2$3k34n$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:36:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="559df8519c024555ab02b0f4d035fcee";
	logging-data="3853068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/IHQfwqqdtVuyMq8DzDDTl+zGJiMGfORQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R5MMRwTzf1L4Hdpqq60c5LL6HGs=
In-Reply-To: <vnj3a2$3k34n$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 6451

On 1/31/2025 1:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2025 at 9:37:23 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/30/2025 6:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Jan 30, 2025 at 2:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 1/30/2025 4:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Jan 30, 2025 at 12:13:03 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 1/30/2025 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Jan 30, 2025 at 9:47:35 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 1/29/2025 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         On Jan 29, 2025 at 8:37:20 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>     "Trump administration to cancel student visas of pro-Palestinian
>>>>>>>>>>     protesters"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-cancel-student-visas-all-hamas-sympathizers-white-house-2025-01-29/
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>   It's a deportable offense under the U.S. Code for a resident alien to
>>>>>>>>>   advocate for or express support for a terrorist organization.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       So then, I'm guessing this administration would've championed
>>>>>>>>       deportations from Skokie in '77.  What do you think?
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>     Was there a designated terrorist organization involved in Skokie, and were
>>>>>>>     the participants resident aliens or American citizens?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Is "pro-Palestine" a terrorist organization?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Nice try. Waving the actual flag of Hamas is not simply 'pro-Palestine'.
>>>>>     Neither is chanting the official Hamas motto from its own charter:
>>>>> "From the
>>>>>     river to the sea."
>>>>>     
>>>>>>        Is pro-Nazi not?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     The American Nazi Party was not a designated terrorist organization and
>>>>> even
>>>>>     if it was, all those marching were American citizens, not resident aliens.
>>>>
>>>>   "A designated terrorist organization" sounds a lot like "It's different
>>>>   when WE do it".
>>>   
>>>   Regardless, if a group hasn't been listed as a designated terrorist group by
>>>   the Department of State, then the statute does not apply. Back in the 70s,
>>>   when the Skokie march occurred, the American Nazi Party was not a designated
>>>   terrorist organization, nor were the participants foreign nationals.
>>>   
>>>>   Trump is punishing these students for their speech
>>>   
>>>   No, he's enforcing American immigration law, something that you apparently
>>>   can't stand, and which Biden failed to do for four straight years. No,
>>> that's
>>>   wrong. Biden didn't fail to do it. That implies a lack of intent. He refused
>>>   to do it.
>>>   
>>>>   once again leveraging populist spleen to flout bedrock American principles.
>>>   
>>>   It's not an American principle to allow agents of violent foreign jihadists
>>>   that hate America to come to this country and radicalize our own population
>>> to
>>>   their cause. That is in no way, shape, or form something the 1st Amendment
>>> was
>>>   intended to protect.
>>>   
>>>>     I can't fathom any free-speech advocate's support of this.
>>>   
>>>   Well, I can't fathom your constant opposition to most of what the 1st
>>>   Amendment *does* protect, so we'll call it a wash.
>>
>> Call it a whitewash, because it is.  These students are being punished
>> for voicing support of Palestine
> 
> If they're hoisting the flag of Hamas and chanting "from the river to the
> sea", then they're doing a lot more than voicing support for Palestine.
> American citizens are allowed to do that but if you're a guest in our country
> you better be on your best behavior and not go all in for a terrorist
> organization that advocates for the destruction of America.
> 
> We don't need you here. You have no right to be here. So endorsing a group
> whose stated goal is the destruction of our country (along with Israel) while
> here as our guest has consequences. Fuck around and find out.
> 
>> Suffice to suppose that, if this deportation initiative were Democratic,
>> you'd be apoplectic.
> 
> I'd be apoplectic because I'd be shocked to my core that the current crop of
> Democrats were actually deporting anyone for anything.
> 
> My idiotic mayor, fresh off her spectacularly appalling performance during the
> wildfires, was on TV yesterday reassuring "the immigrant community" that the
> city of Los Angeles will protect you from ICE no matter what crimes you've
> committed. She's literally on TV telling rapists, murderers, thieves, and
> narco-traffickers that she has their back.
> 
> Never mind that "the immigrant community" she's so worried about has no desire
> to have those violent shitbags turned loose on their streets any more than
> anyone else does.

I get that you're pleased with the practical result of Trump's vendetta, 
just as (I assume) you're pleased that we've let Trump skate on 
attempted election corruption.  I just can't see how you're comfortable 
with the cost to our basic principles (...with more likely to follow).