Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Karen Bass Tweets That Did Not Age Well
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 12:14:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <vnlkq4$6dhs$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vn8raa$16pd6$3@dont-email.me> <vnji44$3n47t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnjjm3$3n3ff$2@dont-email.me> <vnjlh6$3nor9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnjn20$3o3ai$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:14:45 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="702b17389836b849efb3ca033f95d0f8";
	logging-data="210492"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AXVdj7n4FRsluKJW/YxRG7SST9qr1I/o="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xfYEYpggBbwF0ZY18yUV8CaCbuM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vnjn20$3o3ai$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3680

On 1/31/2025 6:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2025 at 3:14:46 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/31/2025 5:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Jan 31, 2025 at 2:16:36 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 1/31/2025 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Jan 31, 2025 at 12:07:41 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 1/31/2025 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Jan 31, 2025 at 9:46:36 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 1/31/2025 12:22 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:10:24 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>         On 1/28/2025 10:23 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>         On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:38:45 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         So what is she being criticized for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>         She's being criticized by Republicans because she's a Democrat.  Her
>>>>>>>>>>>>         apparent incompetence just makes for better political theater.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>         In fairness Republicans WILL criticize Democrats and there are enough
>>>>>>>>>>>         of each that there are BOUND to be a few on far left of the bell curve
>>>>>>>>>>>         for competence (between totally incompetent and being a
>>>>>>>>>>>         miracle-worker)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>         The good ones don't get the flak.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         Nowadays, the opposing party will ALWAYS attack the most vulnerable,
>>>>>>>>>>         even were there only archangels to choose among.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         An exaggeration but not by much...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       Every archangel has a Lucifer in him.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       According to the Christian theology, that's literally not true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Why not? Can there be only one?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Yes, Lucifer was unique.
>>>>
>>>>   Iirc, Lucifer started out as an archangel-in-good-standing ...i.e., like
>>>>   all the others are now.
>>>   
>>>   Right, but it turned out he was inherently different and the only one to be
>>>   so.
>>
>> Before he soured on things, there was no difference.
> 
> There was, just no one (other than god, one presumes) knew it.

We can't know what God knew or didn't know.  And 'presume' makes a 
'priest' of 'u' and 'me'.