Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Mickey the idiot
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 16:59:52 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <vno8aa$pbo5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vnfbn9$2rtn9$1@dont-email.me> <vnh2l4$35v9m$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p1gl6h4fpqxm002@post.eweka.nl> <vnjqfh$3ojl8$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p1jckl5srw3x003@post.eweka.nl> <vnlte3$8fqd$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p1ko2f7421gq000@post.eweka.nl> <vnnufb$nijh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 17:59:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed04225d78d05b583f60828faeba3b64";
	logging-data="831237"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/chuHd5B0rzjSTMZvLJK98sDhSGgITgBg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KW7tApDsrAhXliuHJcPXxNsXGeY=
In-Reply-To: <vnnufb$nijh$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3949

On 02/02/2025 14:11, solar penguin wrote:
> 
> Blueshirt brilliantly brought forth:
> 
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/02/2025 13:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd still find it unlikely that all of the 32 women's stories
>>>> are made up. But even if The Guardian does lose the case, I
>>>> doubt they will go bust.
>>>
>>> It is not just likely but an absolute fact as determined by
>>> the police that all of these women made it all up since the
>>> police did not have enough evidence against Clarke to even
>>> warrant an investigation let alone charge him with a crime.
>>
>> That's not how it works, not having enough evidence to prosecute
>> doesn't mean 'something' didn't happen.
>>
>> If I whip my cock out in my office and shove it in a woman's
>> face and say "suck this if you want a job" and she runs out of
>> the room and goes to the police, if there's no witnesses, CCTV
>> footage or sound footage to back up her claims, then there will
>> be no evidence for a prosecution. He said, she said.
>>
>> But I would still have done it!
>>   
>>> Noel Clark is completely innocent of any crime. Because of
>>> this he is taking the Guardian to court for defamation.
>>
>> Which he might win, or he might lose... he certainly hasn't got
>> off to a great start anyway if that article is correct.
>>
>> Judge AGA cannot say that Noel Clarke is completely innocent
>> though, just as I can't say that he's guilty, as neither of us
>> where there when any of these 'incidents' happened.
>>
>>
> 
> It’s interesting how Aggy repeatedly accuses RTD of being a
> sexual predator on zero evidence, but demands proof for
> the accusations against Noel Clarke.

There's plenty of evidence against RTD. It's in almost everything he 
makes. He's even admitted it himself when he said that he gets thrilled 
every time someone tells him that he discovered as a boy that he was gay 
after watching something Davies wrote or produced.

> 
> Double standards?  Why am I not surprised?
> 

The only double standards are those of the woke.

Why was John Barrowman cancelled for showing his cock on set on Doctor 
Who, which was part of his job description, when it was the pervert RTD 
who told him to strip naked on order to film a scene where he pulled a 
gun out of his arse in a children's TV programme? Why wasn't Davies 
cancelled as well?  Why did the pervert Chris Chibnall ask Barrowman to 
strip naked on Torchwood? Why wasn't Chibnall also cancelled?

-- 
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it 
stands for." -William Shatner