| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vnt8jn$1stg5$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed? Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:35:31 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 57 Message-ID: <vnt8jn$1stg5$1@dont-email.me> References: <vn0pv2$2cdge$1@dont-email.me> <3l98pj1sdf0rg51lv03l2vgf36guvquj4s@4ax.com> <vn1joj$2gutd$2@dont-email.me> <vn8ue5$189p2$3@dont-email.me> <hv3gpj9djv00laugm2guoun789toku68gu@4ax.com> <vn990o$1blp1$1@dont-email.me> <p7chpj11l2gs521785lr9ggqf2jhgmh4n8@4ax.com> <ovlmpjd4gefae134coomgqug9r3polgir3@4ax.com> <vnipv1$3ib0p$1@dont-email.me> <bq7oP.243375$HO1.192939@fx14.iad> <vnrs3g$1ics3$2@dont-email.me> <vnrsih$1iev4$1@dont-email.me> <vnrtd0$1ics3$3@dont-email.me> <dj93qj9d2mbs8td9bqdc02n7509brfuml1@4ax.com> <vnsp50$1q7ob$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:35:36 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d0b5584de7b09f135785adf793283ce"; logging-data="1996293"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GPPZQ4yqdmkVBxXtnskTvdehi4XVMVAs=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZcEK1bQaMm9pbwJCl30vSM+PAtk= In-Reply-To: <vnsp50$1q7ob$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 2/4/2025 5:11 AM, zen cycle wrote: > On 2/4/2025 12:48 AM, John B. wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:18:05 -0500, Frank Krygowski >> <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2/3/2025 9:04 PM, AMuzi wrote: >>>> On 2/3/2025 7:55 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>> On 2/3/2025 12:55 PM, cyclintom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Noone "wins" an argument about opinions. Is that what you think >>>>>> you're doing by arguing that Catrike shouldn't be carrying a gun >>>>>> despite a Constitutional Amendment giving him the right to do so? >>>>>> Your opinion appears to be counter to the Constitution and you >>>>>> believe that you're winning something? Murder rates tend to be lowest >>>>>> in areas with the most highly rural populations so zsparate people >>>>>> and you don't have violent confrontations. Gun laws make little to no >>>>>> diffrence. >>>>> >>>>> I'm just pointing out that almost all people who carry guns do so >>>>> because they are afraid. In nearly all cases, they are afraid of >>>>> things that never happen. That's phobia. >>>>> >>>>> And I'm aware I'm violating my resolution to stop responding to, um, a >>>>> certain type of person. I'll try to do better. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I post enough current successful defensive use videos to show that >>>> risks >>>> are real (although situationally more or less) and that preparation and >>>> training may well be dispositive /in extremis/. >>>> >>>> Fear? OK, perhaps. Rational risk assessment is another equally valid >>>> term. >>> >>> Or is it irrational risk assessment? Hey, let's see what the NRA says! >>> >>> https://www.mediamatters.org/national-rifle-association/nra- >>> commentary-admits-odds-needing-gun-defend-yourself-are-infinitesimal >> >> Wet another Tommy Trick... changing the subject. >> >> Or does your latest post explain fear and loathing among those who >> elect to carrying a gun - a perfectly legal act in most? <many)? >> States today. > > FFS... > Andrew mentioned he posted numerous examples of guns being used for self > defense, Frank responded by posting a link showing the odds for needing > a gun for self defense are "infinitesimal". > > It wasn't a change of subject, asshat. John has trouble following conversations. -- - Frank Krygowski