Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Corr.: now -> new (Was: I never post boring schooling)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:33:43 +0100
Message-ID: <vnu4k7$vahi$2@solani.org>
References: <vn98q6$ie21$4@solani.org> <vnslb8$ue77$4@solani.org>
 <vnu020$v7ev$2@solani.org> <vnu4f7$vahi$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:33:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1026610"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VbIZ0MJMrfkl06AIHLgjIYVVs2E=
X-User-ID: eJwNyMEBwCAIA8CVRCDBcQRh/xHae54rBEWDw3x8MuMyDYV+ddncpMj0o61q3Zv1V0153j7xlvSEKla/OJ34AHd9FmI=
In-Reply-To: <vnu4f7$vahi$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 5639
Lines: 140

Hi,

Typo: now -> new

 > to generate now thinking

Should read:

 > to generate new thinking

I shit and piss on some asslicking group
that cannot think on his own. Thank god
USENET has only rarely such group morons.

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> You wouldn't notic that I speak for myself
> always and ever. Just remove the links and
> you see its all text original by me.
> 
> I always post geniun commentary to current
> events which are solely the product of my
> own mind. I do not intend to educate something.
> 
> My intention is to document my current
> understanding and to generate now thinking.
> If you have expected some schooling, I am very
> 
> sorry for you. I never post boring schooling.
> 
> Bye
> 
> ---------------- cut here -----------------
> 
> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
> 
> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
> 
> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
> 
> multiple policies automatically:
> 
> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
> 
> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
> topics might be found from data, through a form of
> abduction.
> 
> ---------------- cut here -----------------
> 
> 
> Physfitfreak schrieb:
>> On 2/4/25 3:06 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
>>> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
>>> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
>>>
>>> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
>>> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
>>> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
>>>
>>> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
>>> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
>>> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
>>>
>>> multiple policies automatically:
>>>
>>> Group Preference Optimization
>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11523
>>>
>>> DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits
>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
>>>
>>> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
>>> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
>>> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
>>>
>>> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
>>> topics might be found from data, through a form of
>>> abduction.
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Wait till USA figures out there is a second
>>>> competitor besides DeepSeek, its called Yi-Lightning:
>>>>
>>>> Yi-Lightning Technical Report
>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01253
>>>>
>>>> It was already discussed 2 months ago:
>>>>
>>>> Eric Schmidt DROPS BOMBSHELL: China DOMINATES AI!
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddWuEUjo4u4
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although better than nothing, 
>> it still is an extremely inefficient way to communicate.
>>
>> Speak, yourself, in the way that a first year undergraduate prof 
>> explains stuff to the students who just a few months earlier finished 
>> their high schooling.
>>
>> Then you will communicate.
>>
>> If it is too difficult to do that (cause requires deep understanding 
>> of the subject by yourself), or, if you don't get time doing all that, 
>> then break the job down into little pieces. A day at a time, or a week 
>> at a time.
>>
>> You'd be spending the same amount of time as you are now, and yet you 
>> will actually communicate something with those with physics background.
>>
>> Did I have to say this? I don't think so. But your intentions here are 
>> vague. But if you need support for your own gains in understanding the 
>> subject, you just have to do it the way I explained above. Then you 
>> will get that support. Not from Bozos and "engineers", but from me and 
>> anybody with actual physics background and such trainings.
>>
>> There are a few actual physicists in relativity group that can join 
>> in, but only if you do it the way I explained above.