Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vo0kc9$2hsu5$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Serial killer serving 15 life sentences is innocent of all
 charges
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:14:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vo0kc9$2hsu5$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vo0b3d$1cui6$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 22:14:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae3c7d43828746fe7b42e405f84e1e30";
	logging-data="2683845"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dLDVpaMXq6J0G8PpwvzzKUPVkj0fcM0A="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RLzdL/qh54RZEnYDvlCWDmpMV0U=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2450

Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

>I don't know how much you've heard about Lucy Letby, a young nurse who 
>has been accused and convicted of killing 7 or 8 babies and severely 
>injuring 7 or 8 others. She's serving 15 life sentences for her crimes.

>An international panel of medical experts got together and re-examined 
>all the medical evidence. Their conclusion: there were NO murders. The 
>deaths of these babies were the result of substandard care that they 
>blamed on the hospital, not Nurse Letby.

>Her lawyers have already forwarded this new information to a body that 
>can get her sentences dropped and a Conservative MP is championing her 
>cause. No idea how long any change in her status will take. I don't know 
>if the Crown Prosecution Service will fight the findings of these experts.

>I found this a rather breathtaking development. I can't remember ever 
>hearing about a case where someone who had been convicted of being a 
>serial killer then found to be innocent of all charges.

>Her defence certainly did a horrible job in not getting this kind of 
>evidence during the trial rather than only coming up with it almost a 
>decade after her conviction!

I don't get it. With patterns of morbidity and mortality in hospitals,
they look for common factors, so these patterns that led to death should
have been seen in babies she didn't care for.

Also, what's the explanation for her being on shift and failing to
report the substandard care even if she herself wasn't committing
malpractice?