Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vo2us8$32kg8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right
 paracaval lymph node
Followup-To: comp.theory
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:26:16 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <vo2us8$32kg8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vnumf8$24cq0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnv4tf$2a40b$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vnvv32$2e9m1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo2pd4$31nli$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 19:26:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b73d2074722da50c8288ee9db835ff62";
	logging-data="3232264"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CoTavuL2h938mKOPSj6XY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wJ/ztWCfJBT72vnepouS4BXvugg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vo2pd4$31nli$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250206-4, 2/6/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 2699

On 2/6/2025 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 05.02.2025 um 16:11 schrieb olcott:
>> On 2/5/2025 1:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>> Am 05.02.2025 um 04:38 schrieb olcott:
>>>> This treatment does not typically last very long and
>>>> will be immediately followed by a riskier fourth line
>>>> of treatment that has an initial success rate much higher
>>>> than its non progression mortality rate.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Halting problem solved !
>>>
>>
>> The halting problem proof input does specify non-halting
>> behavior to its decider.
>>
>> https://www.researchgate.net/ 
>> publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D
> 
> LOOOOOOOOL

Anyone that understands the C programming language
sufficiently well (thus not confused by the unreachable
"if" statement) correctly understands that DD simulated
by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction.

When we add a little computer science to this then we
know that the input to HHH does not halt.

typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer