Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: procfs -- Too Much Info
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:03:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vo47mo$3clnl$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vnmooa$dcla$1@dont-email.me> <87msey1p1g.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 07:03:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c226e69c71395d6979013e6628449e57";
	logging-data="3561205"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W6Ztlr1I0G1Rxc+sKUTxZ"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q0kn2jYGklfryJ/OVSaYTu8Awuc=
Bytes: 1412

On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 23:12:11 -0300, Salvador Mirzo wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> 
>> What used to be a single proc(5) man page has now been broken out into
>> over a hundred separate pages. You can find them with
>>
>>     man -s5 -k proc | grep ^proc
> 
> GNU systems should learn the OpenBSD way of writing manuals.

What’s the equivalent of procfs on OpenBSD? OtherBSD?