Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vo7u2s$3nof$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden
 admin account
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 15:43:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <vo7u2s$3nof$2@dont-email.me>
References: <6rRkP.109425$HxS1.57487@fx39.iad>
 <vn14qo$2ed5m$3@dont-email.me> <vn4b63$3da21$2@dont-email.me>
 <vn5lo1$3t56b$1@dont-email.me> <vn76qo$j17u$3@dont-email.me>
 <vn81h9$t0qo$1@dont-email.me> <9h9aqj96s28rtssnruivlvc8pt86grtine@4ax.com>
 <vo3l0g$36h63$1@dont-email.me> <4ropP.2$ZBI5.0@fx42.iad>
 <vo5gkl$3jkkc$1@dont-email.me> <bdypP.71460$YsRf.53457@fx18.iad>
 <vo710r$3un43$1@dont-email.me> <XxJpP.37$EyH6.20@fx45.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:43:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3e2a582780ad21df83ca7d7403115706";
	logging-data="122639"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mbA4spQPF+CF0B0y1EIRy"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0NLN5CBZh8gt4UWmTpT8dwGes1I=
Bytes: 4546

On 2025-02-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-02-08 2:27 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-02-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-02-07 12:41 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-02-06 7:44 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/6/2025 4:18 PM, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when I see Winblows now it just looks inferior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about it looks inferior to what you're using (Debian 12)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't run a Linux DE in a few years probably, so I am curious how
>>>>>> they're looking and feeling these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> KDE is spectacular, the rest is underwhelming. However, most people
>>>>> using Linux aren't looking for something pretty since they believe that
>>>>> the OS should stay out of the way. They would want resources to
>>>>> primarily be available to the software rather than the operating system
>>>>> itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still, KDE compares very favourably with the commercial competition.
>>>>
>>>> To me KDE is kind of "gimmicky." I like Cinnamon, Mate and Xfce much better.
>>>> (Mate and Xfce the way Linux Mint sets them up, not necessarily "generic"
>>>> versions.) I don't like "standard" Gnome at all.
>>>>
>>>> That's one of the advantages of Linux. Lots of choice, not "one size fits
>>>> all."
>>>
>>> I find just about everything about KDE to be perfect. The fact that it
>>> allows me to know how much wear there is on my battery by default is
>>> spectacular. In Windows, you need BatteryBar to get that information or
>>> to run a command in the terminal. It also makes theming easy unlike
>>> Gnome. Desktop effects are also there if you want to make a change or
>>> modify how it works. Meanwhile, it doesn't feel heavy at all and I found
>>> it to be rock solid. It will definitely be my choice of desktop
>>> environment going forward.
>> 
>> I understand. I don't like KDE. Too "busy" for me. But that's the advantage
>> of Linux with the ability to choose and use what you like.
>> 
>> As for battery health I can just type inxi -B in a terminal. Now I see I
>> have a discrepency. The BIOS shows "excellent battery health" and inxi -B
>> shows 67% health on my newest laptop. I'm guessing inxi -B is right since
>> I'm only getting about 7 hours battery life on this Latitude 5300. It's
>> supposed to be somewhere around ten hours (or even 12).
>> 
>> inxi is useful for a lot of things.
>
> 67% health suggests that you routinely charge it to 100% and let it 
> drain to 0%. I never do. I charge to 80% and usually charge before it 
> gets to 40%. As a result, even after two years since my battery change, 
> my health is at 98%. It was the same on the Mac before I got rid of it.

I haven't had the computer long enough to "routinely" do anything to it. But 
I honestly beleive that these Latitudes were used for desktop computers at 
Idaho Power and we're always attached to Docks — so constantly charging to 
100%.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien