Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-02-07 (Friday)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 04:30:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <voa82s$l0k3$2@dont-email.me>
References: <UBI20250206@dont-email.me!> <vo8293$40gk$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 13:46:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a7340c70d34b69d7bedc5f2adbfda68";
	logging-data="688771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xqvdLWjJqa17zLfe+fFQTpZOcmO0i03U="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rsVi5iya4LcHqHVU+RenZGU8X3k=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 1824

In article <vo8293$40gk$1@dont-email.me>, ijball@mac.invalid wrote:

>Beetlejuice (back on Max, after a month on Peacock) - In "glorious 4k!" 
>- or, rather, it would have been had Max not taken that away from us 
>cable subscribers!!  >:/
>    I admit - I was fooled by the opening credits fly-over shot. In 
>fact, I still can't figure out if that was partly real footage of a 
>fly-over of the actual Vermont(?) village (note: the film is actually 
>supposedly set in Connecticut, though I missed this if it was said 
>onscreen...) they filmed that seamlessly transitions to a fly-over of 
>the model, or if it was the model 100% of the time (which means the 
>first part of the model was so life-like as to fool the audience!).

I seem to remember at the time that the cutting edge tech at the time was 
using a computer to track a camera over a model.

https://youtu.be/DhETlS5_EpM?si=8MemlaYfa_CowNo9

--
Not a joke! Don't jump!