| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vobaaa$rhmq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Tarski Followup-To: sci.logic Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:30:34 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 93 Message-ID: <vobaaa$rhmq$1@dont-email.me> References: <vnh0sq$35mcm$1@dont-email.me> <vni4ta$3ek8m$1@dont-email.me> <vnikre$3hb19$1@dont-email.me> <vnkov9$1971$1@dont-email.me> <vnl9vj$4f8i$1@dont-email.me> <vnndqs$kef3$1@dont-email.me> <vnpd96$vl84$1@dont-email.me> <vnqm3p$1apip$1@dont-email.me> <vnqsbh$1c5sq$1@dont-email.me> <vnsm90$1pr86$1@dont-email.me> <vnte6s$1tra8$1@dont-email.me> <vnv4tf$2a43e$1@dont-email.me> <vo0249$2eqdl$1@dont-email.me> <vo1qae$2s4cr$1@dont-email.me> <vo2i10$302f0$1@dont-email.me> <vo4nj4$3f6so$1@dont-email.me> <vo5btf$3ipo2$1@dont-email.me> <vo7ckh$q2p$1@dont-email.me> <vo7tdg$36ra$6@dont-email.me> <6f2dndBWC7gd4Dr6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vo9krm$3octb$1@dont-email.me> <voae76$m3dj$1@dont-email.me> <3f1ed83042ed4a260d1a63ef7c61528ea9858947@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 23:30:35 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d7b7e128809f1e0bad2050f21bb5c16"; logging-data="902874"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/I9nQtG0bOqmx0Yh/7rhzt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xhk5OL5UAehQ2di1MxPbAtxLWlc= In-Reply-To: <3f1ed83042ed4a260d1a63ef7c61528ea9858947@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250209-4, 2/9/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 5323 On 2/9/2025 11:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/9/25 9:31 AM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/9/2025 1:18 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>> On 08/02/2025 16:51, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> On 02/08/2025 07:32 AM, olcott wrote: >>> >>>>> (2) Semantics is fully integrated into every expression of >>>>> language with each unique natural language sense meaning >>>>> of a word having its own GUID. >>> >>> Illusion and the tyranny of delusion, ad nauseam. >>> >>>>> And I am finishing the job. I may have only one month left. >>>>> The cancer treatment that I will have next month has a 5% chance >>>>> of killing me and a 1% chance of ruining my brain. It also has >>>>> about a 70% chance of giving me at least two more years of life. >>> >>> Food be your medicine, medicine be your food. Conversely, >>> good luck with any of that. >>> >>>> Instead of just usual model theory and axiomatics >>>> and "what's true in the logical theory", "what's >>>> not falsified in the scientific theory", you can >>>> have a theory where the quantity is truth, and >>>> then there's a Comenius language of it that only >>>> truisms are well-formed formulas, then the Liar >>>> "paradox" is only a prototype of a fallacy, >>> >>> Rather, then there is no such thing as a "fallacy", only >>> flat positivism and Newspeak. Indeed, Popper already is >>> yet another bad joke at best, but WTF would you know... >>> >> >> In other words you did not understand what he said thus >> replied to his words with nonsense gibberish pure rhetoric >> with no actual basis in reasoning. >> >> >> there's a Comenius language of it that only >> >> truisms are well-formed formulas >> >> True(L,x) <is> a mathematical mapping from finite string >> expressions of language through a truthmaker to finite >> strings expressions providing formalized semantic meanings >> making the expression true. >> >> The prototype of a fallacy that he referred to is the >> recursive structure of pathological self-reference that >> never resolves to a truth value. > > And, such a mapping can't exist if the language allows references like: > > x is defined to be !True(L, x) > When we frame it the succinct way that Ross framed it >> there's a Comenius language of it that only >> truisms are well-formed formulas Then the above expression is simply rejected as not a WFF of this Comenius language. > As such a statement can't be mapped to True or False without also > mapping True to False or False to True. > > Note, he shows that such a statement CAN be formed in logic system with > certain minimal properties, like being able to express the Natural > Numbers and their properties. > > So, I guess you are admitting that to you "logic" can't handle something > like mathematics. > The Comenius language expresses the key essence of the most important aspect of my idea, rejecting expressions that do not evaluate to Boolean as ill-formed. It only has TRUE and ill-formed. My system has TRUE, FALSE and ill-formed. All undecidable propositions fall into the ill-formed category and logic is otherwise essentially unchanged. >> >>> We live in a yellow submarine, just yellower and yellower. >>> >>> -Julio >>> >> >> > -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer