Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vobaaa$rhmq$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception ---
 Tarski
Followup-To: sci.logic
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:30:34 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <vobaaa$rhmq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vnh0sq$35mcm$1@dont-email.me> <vni4ta$3ek8m$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnikre$3hb19$1@dont-email.me> <vnkov9$1971$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnl9vj$4f8i$1@dont-email.me> <vnndqs$kef3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnpd96$vl84$1@dont-email.me> <vnqm3p$1apip$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnqsbh$1c5sq$1@dont-email.me> <vnsm90$1pr86$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnte6s$1tra8$1@dont-email.me> <vnv4tf$2a43e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo0249$2eqdl$1@dont-email.me> <vo1qae$2s4cr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo2i10$302f0$1@dont-email.me> <vo4nj4$3f6so$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo5btf$3ipo2$1@dont-email.me> <vo7ckh$q2p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7tdg$36ra$6@dont-email.me> <6f2dndBWC7gd4Dr6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vo9krm$3octb$1@dont-email.me> <voae76$m3dj$1@dont-email.me>
 <3f1ed83042ed4a260d1a63ef7c61528ea9858947@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 23:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0d7b7e128809f1e0bad2050f21bb5c16";
	logging-data="902874"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/I9nQtG0bOqmx0Yh/7rhzt"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xhk5OL5UAehQ2di1MxPbAtxLWlc=
In-Reply-To: <3f1ed83042ed4a260d1a63ef7c61528ea9858947@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250209-4, 2/9/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 5323

On 2/9/2025 11:04 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 2/9/25 9:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 2/9/2025 1:18 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2025 16:51, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 02/08/2025 07:32 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>
>>>>> (2) Semantics is fully integrated into every expression of
>>>>> language with each unique natural language sense meaning
>>>>> of a word having its own GUID.
>>>
>>> Illusion and the tyranny of delusion, ad nauseam.
>>>
>>>>> And I am finishing the job. I may have only one month left.
>>>>> The cancer treatment that I will have next month has a 5% chance
>>>>> of killing me and a 1% chance of ruining my brain. It also has
>>>>> about a 70% chance of giving me at least two more years of life.
>>>
>>> Food be your medicine, medicine be your food.  Conversely,
>>> good luck with any of that.
>>>
>>>> Instead of just usual model theory and axiomatics
>>>> and "what's true in the logical theory", "what's
>>>> not falsified in the scientific theory", you can
>>>> have a theory where the quantity is truth, and
>>>> then there's a Comenius language of it that only
>>>> truisms are well-formed formulas, then the Liar
>>>> "paradox" is only a prototype of a fallacy,
>>>
>>> Rather, then there is no such thing as a "fallacy", only
>>> flat positivism and Newspeak.  Indeed, Popper already is
>>> yet another bad joke at best, but WTF would you know...
>>>
>>
>> In other words you did not understand what he said thus
>> replied to his words with nonsense gibberish pure rhetoric
>> with no actual basis in reasoning.
>>
>>  >> there's a Comenius language of it that only
>>  >> truisms are well-formed formulas
>>
>> True(L,x) <is> a mathematical mapping from finite string
>> expressions of language through a truthmaker to finite
>> strings expressions providing formalized semantic meanings
>> making the expression true.
>>
>> The prototype of a fallacy that he referred to is the
>> recursive structure of pathological self-reference that
>> never resolves to a truth value.
> 
> And, such a mapping can't exist if the language allows references like:
> 
> x is defined to be !True(L, x)
> 

When we frame it the succinct way that Ross framed it
 >> there's a Comenius language of it that only
 >> truisms are well-formed formulas

Then the above expression is simply rejected as not
a WFF of this Comenius language.

> As such a statement can't be mapped to True or False without also 
> mapping True to False or False to True.
> 
> Note, he shows that such a statement CAN be formed in logic system with 
> certain minimal properties, like being able to express the Natural 
> Numbers and their properties.
> 
> So, I guess you are admitting that to you "logic" can't handle something 
> like mathematics.
> 

The Comenius language expresses the key essence of the most
important aspect of my idea, rejecting expressions that do
not evaluate to Boolean as ill-formed. It only has TRUE
and ill-formed. My system has TRUE, FALSE and ill-formed.

All undecidable propositions fall into the ill-formed category
and logic is otherwise essentially unchanged.

>>
>>> We live in a yellow submarine, just yellower and yellower.
>>>
>>> -Julio
>>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer