| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vodl5d$1br71$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Revealing thought experiment Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 06:47:56 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 78 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vodl5d$1br71$1@dont-email.me> References: <vo5vtm$3lts8$2@dont-email.me> <vociad$15d2p$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="74596"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:NQqojo9tJl6ZVxpUZ3qUFvdka4g= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id EE37A22978C; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:48:06 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AC1229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:48:04 -0500 (EST) id 980621C079F; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5B11C0790 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B1F6061C for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/42B1F6061C; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 18530DC01CA; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:47:58 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:47:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <vociad$15d2p$1@dont-email.me> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19QVBhGUI0mFrirliSlvn1lR4VNwVyWwWA= Content-Language: en-US HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 4980 On 10/02/2025 8:53 pm, Ernest Major wrote: > On 07/02/2025 22:02, MarkE wrote: >> Does the following quotation demonstrate that the naturalistic origin >> of life involves amplifying a vanishingly small probability (i.e. the >> probability of spontaneous generation in a jar, with small >> probabilistic resources of space and time available), to a larger >> probability (i.e. the universe over its entire history)? >> >> That is, does it demonstrate that the naturalistic origin of life is >> spontaneous generation, only with more time and space than Redi and >> Pasteur allowed? > > Only if you ignore the conceptual differences between spontaneous > generation and spontaneous abiogenesis. What it does reveal is how > modern views are contaminating contemporary understanding of spontaneous > generation. It also reveals that an understanding that intuition is a > poor guide to processes occurring on spatial and temporal scales far > removed from everyday experience is more widespread than I feared. As per my response to Ron, fair point. Some proponents of spontaneous generation regarded it as evidence of a "life force" in non-living matter (e.g. Aristotle, and John Needham 1745). >> >> ______ >> >> >> "At this point, I introduced Louis Pasteur’s pasteurization >> experiment, which convinced the world that even microorganisms could >> not be generated spontaneously. >> >> And all students agreed on that conclusion. The following text is a >> record of my conversation with my students afterward. >> >> Tan. Are you confident that the experiments by Redi and Pasteur have >> proved that spontaneous generation is impossible? >> >> Students. Yes. >> >> Tan. Sure? >> >> Students. Yes. >> >> Tan. Does it matter what sizes the jars/bottles were? >> >> Students. No. >> >> Tan. Does it matter how long they waited? >> >> Students. No. >> >> Tan. Sure? >> >> Students. Yes. >> >> Tan. What if the bottles are very big? I mean very big, really big. >> Still positive? >> >> Students. Yes. >> >> Tan. How about this big? (A picture of the globe was shown.) Still >> positive? >> >> Students. Uh… (Some hesitated.) >> >> Tan. How about this big? (A picture of the visible universe of the >> Hubble deep field was shown.) Still positive? >> >> Students. (Silence.) >> >> How about you?" >> >> >> Tan, Change; Stadler, Rob. The Stairway To Life: An Origin-Of-Life >> Reality Check (pp. 179-180). Evorevo Books. Kindle Edition. >> >