Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vodl5d$1br71$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Revealing thought experiment
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 06:47:56 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 78
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vodl5d$1br71$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo5vtm$3lts8$2@dont-email.me> <vociad$15d2p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="74596"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NQqojo9tJl6ZVxpUZ3qUFvdka4g=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id EE37A22978C; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:48:06 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AC1229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:48:04 -0500 (EST)
	id 980621C079F; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5B11C0790
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B1F6061C
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:47:58 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/42B1F6061C; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id 18530DC01CA; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:47:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:47:57 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <vociad$15d2p$1@dont-email.me>
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19QVBhGUI0mFrirliSlvn1lR4VNwVyWwWA=
Content-Language: en-US
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 4980

On 10/02/2025 8:53 pm, Ernest Major wrote:
> On 07/02/2025 22:02, MarkE wrote:
>> Does the following quotation demonstrate that the naturalistic origin 
>> of life involves amplifying a vanishingly small probability (i.e. the 
>> probability of spontaneous generation in a jar, with small 
>> probabilistic resources of space and time available), to a larger 
>> probability (i.e. the universe over its entire history)?
>>
>> That is, does it demonstrate that the naturalistic origin of life is 
>> spontaneous generation, only with more time and space than Redi and 
>> Pasteur allowed?
> 
> Only if you ignore the conceptual differences between spontaneous 
> generation and spontaneous abiogenesis. What it does reveal is how 
> modern views are contaminating contemporary understanding of spontaneous 
> generation. It also reveals that an understanding that intuition is a 
> poor guide to processes occurring on spatial and temporal scales far 
> removed from everyday experience is more widespread than I feared.

As per my response to Ron, fair point. Some proponents of spontaneous 
generation regarded it as evidence of a "life force" in non-living 
matter (e.g. Aristotle, and John Needham 1745).

>>
>> ______
>>
>>
>> "At this point, I introduced Louis Pasteur’s pasteurization 
>> experiment, which convinced the world that even microorganisms could 
>> not be generated spontaneously.
>>
>> And all students agreed on that conclusion. The following text is a 
>> record of my conversation with my students afterward.
>>
>> Tan. Are you confident that the experiments by Redi and Pasteur have 
>> proved that spontaneous generation is impossible?
>>
>> Students. Yes.
>>
>> Tan. Sure?
>>
>> Students. Yes.
>>
>> Tan. Does it matter what sizes the jars/bottles were?
>>
>> Students. No.
>>
>> Tan. Does it matter how long they waited?
>>
>> Students. No.
>>
>> Tan. Sure?
>>
>> Students. Yes.
>>
>> Tan. What if the bottles are very big? I mean very big, really big. 
>> Still positive?
>>
>> Students. Yes.
>>
>> Tan. How about this big? (A picture of the globe was shown.) Still 
>> positive?
>>
>> Students. Uh… (Some hesitated.)
>>
>> Tan. How about this big? (A picture of the visible universe of the 
>> Hubble deep field was shown.) Still positive?
>>
>> Students. (Silence.)
>>
>> How about you?"
>>
>>
>> Tan, Change; Stadler, Rob. The Stairway To Life: An Origin-Of-Life 
>> Reality Check (pp. 179-180). Evorevo Books. Kindle Edition.
>>
>