| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vog8b5$1tfve$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Don't come back, Shane Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:27:32 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 71 Message-ID: <vog8b5$1tfve$1@dont-email.me> References: <vog69f$1tbcr$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:27:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c52871f83347b26584477c75110d438a"; logging-data="2015214"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+K4h0SUIEi4gVyUVyBD/ZrbV4VCBmWHGM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ut9Y3ViYU4KlRmSAOXxShcavnRo= In-Reply-To: <vog69f$1tbcr$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 2/11/2025 1:52 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > I first saw Shane (1953) in junior high English class. The > literature-appreciation curriculum loved teaching the kids about > "perfect" story structure, so everybody reads The Lonliness of the Long > Distance Runner. > > We were also taught to write the highly-structured three-three essay. > > As a tv viewer, there's nothing wrong with structured story telling. The > audience expects developments to occur at certain points; the writer of > the teleplay should meet those expectations. This doesn't interfere with > good writing, but it doesn't enhance it either. > > It's just structure. > > As a kid, I really never liked the movie all that much. It has its > merits: gorgeous scenery, excellent performances from Van Heflin and > Jean Arthur and the supporting cast, and the iconic performance of Alan > Ladd's career. > > But the story is simplistic and the characters serve the needs of the > plot. Van Heflin and the nice settlers in the valley are barely eeking > out a living. The evil Ryker family wants to expand their cattle ranch > onto land they don't own if only they could drive away the settlers. > > This is the movie in which the womenfolk are stampeded and cattle raped. > > Everybody else but Van Heflin wants to move because, well, the Rykers > are murderous. Van Heflin keeps talking them into staying which > predictably gets them killed because he has no plan. > > Jack Palance, excellent in an early role and also nominated, is the > henchman hired by the Rykers who flat out murders Elisha Cook in a > famous scene. (Quick: Come up with more than three roles in which Cook > isn't murdered on screen or killed off screen.) > > The tall dark stranger rides into the valley, but he's blond and average > height Shane as played by Alan Ladd and we really have to suspend > disbelief about the men he's killed in backstory. > > Shane's motivation is less Truth Justice and the American Way but that > he's in love with Jean Arthur. > > Then you've got the infuriating performance from the kid Joey > (Oscar-nominated Brandon deWilde). The kid is SUPPOSED to be annoying. > Success! But he doesn't work as a point-of-view character. For the kid, > it's all self indulgence and instant gratification. Well, at that age, > we might believe it but there's nothing natural about the performance, > and even if he were a better actor, that he's got zero respect for his > father throughout much of the picture makes the audience kind of dislike > him, impatient with him because he never learns to understand. > > Nor is it a coming of age story. The kid goes through hero worship > phases, things don't go the way he wants them, and he hates his hero. > Then a responsible adult tries to explain the situation to him. He > claims to understand, forgives his hero then goes right back to hero > worshipping him. > > We get better performances from several of the well-trained dogs than > the kid. > > My opinion is in the minority. This is one of the most popular Westerns > both at initial release and viewers over the decades who think it's > stood the test of time. Also fun to see Metacritic's 17 reviews, bookended by two luminaries: Bosley Crowther, who's overawed, and Pauline Kael, who's unimpressed. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/shane/critic-reviews/